首页> 外文学位 >DETERMINANTS OF PRIMARY SUPPORT SYSTEM STRENGTH AMONG URBAN, WIDOWED WOMEN: DOES LIFE STAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
【24h】

DETERMINANTS OF PRIMARY SUPPORT SYSTEM STRENGTH AMONG URBAN, WIDOWED WOMEN: DOES LIFE STAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

机译:都市寡妇中主要支持系统强度的决定因素:生命阶段是否有所不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This sociological investigation focused on the later widowhood period when, for the majority of widows, active grieving is over, the loss of the husband has been accepted, and rebuilding and repatterning one's life have become paramount. Social integration (i.e., social support system strength measured by the number of active family and friendship roles) of relatively long-time, urban widows was the part of the later widowhood period on which this study concentrated. The purposes of the study were to investigate the factors associated with primary support system strength of widows, to determine whether the same or different factors are predictive of support system strength among family and friends, and to determine whether or not these factors are equally predictive of support system strength of widows in three different life stages: (1) young and middle-aged (women under 60 years of age), (2) young-old (women age 60 through 74), and (3) old-old (women 75 years of age and over).;The assumption that self-initiating behavior is essential to the development of strong social support systems became evident from the findings. For the total sample of widows, completed education, employment history, religious involvement, social activities, and organizational memberships were positively associated with at least one type of primary support system strength. As hypothesized, factors influencing primary support system strength did differ by type of support system strength (family or friendship) and by life stage of the widow. Overall, the regression models were least predictive of primary support system strength for the young and middle-aged widows and most predictive for the old-old widows.;Unexpectedly, vulnerability of the widow was related to family support system strength among older widows in much the same way that self-initiating behavior was related to both types of support system strength for the total sample of widows. Among the young-old widows, low income and the presence of grieving were associated with support system strength among family members; among the oldest life stage group, the presence of physical health problems, hostility, and low life satisfaction were associated with this dependent variable. Low income was associated with support system strength among both family and friends for the old-old widows. Thus, it is only in old age that the "traditional" (i.e., the tearful, bereft, and unhappy) widow emerges; however, vulnerability and negative attributes in these elderly widows do not predispose them to abandonment and isolation. Instead, support systems, especially the family support system, become more tolerant and flexible in these instances.;A sub-set of respondents and variables from the 1974 Widowhood Support System Survey, conducted by Helena Lopata, Loyola University of Chicago, and the Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, provided the data base for this research. The universe for the original study was composed of women who were current or recent past recipients of some form of Social Security Administration benefit as a result of having been widowed. In addition, the women had to be residents of the Chicago Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area at the time of the survey. The study was designed so that widows from five Social Security Administration benefit recipient categories were represented adequately in the sample. These categories included: (1) widows with dependent children, (2) retirement widows, (3) remarried widows, (4) widows with adult children, and (5) "lump sum" payment widows. Data were collected in face-to-face interviews. This research was a secondary analysis of these data. The subgroup under investigation included only those women who had remained widows after their husbands died (unweighted number of cases = 967). Multiple regression/correlation techniques were used in the analysis of these data.
机译:这项社会学研究的重点是在寡妇后期,对于大多数寡妇来说,积极的悲伤结束了,丈夫的丧葬已被接受,重建和重新生活变得至关重要。相对长期的城市寡妇的社会融合(即,通过活跃的家庭成员和友谊角色的数量衡量的社会支持系统的强度)是本研究关注的后来丧偶时期的一部分。这项研究的目的是调查与寡妇的主要支持系统强度有关的因素,确定相同或不同的因素是否可以预测家人和朋友之间的支持系统强度,并确定这些因素是否可以同样地预测寡妇。在三个不同的生命阶段中支持寡妇的系统强度:(1)年轻和中年(60岁以下的女性),(2)年轻(60至74岁的女性)和(3)老年(从发现中可以明显看出,自我激励行为对于发展强大的社会支持系统至关重要的假设已成为现实。对于寡妇总数而言,完成的教育,工作经历,宗教参与,社会活动和组织成员资格与至少一种主要支持系统的强度呈正相关。如假设的那样,影响主要支持系统强度的因素确实因支持系统强度的类型(家庭或友谊)和寡妇的生活阶段而异。总体而言,回归模型最不能预测年轻和中年寡妇的主要支持系统强度,而最能预测老年人的寡妇。;出乎意料的是,寡妇的脆弱性与老年人寡妇的家庭支持系统强度有关寡妇总样本的自我启动行为与两种类型的支持系统强度相关的方式相同。在年轻的寡妇中,低收入和悲伤的存在与家庭成员的支持系统强度有关。在年龄最大的人群中,身体健康问题,敌意和较低的生活满意度与该因变量相关。低收入与老年寡妇的家人和朋友的支持系统强度有关。因此,只有在年老时,才会出现“传统的”(即流泪,流泪和不快乐的)寡妇。但是,这些老年寡妇的脆弱性和负面特征并不会使他们容易被遗弃和孤立。相反,在这些情况下,支持系统(尤其是家庭支持系统)变得更加宽容和灵活。; 1974年寡妇支持系统调查(由芝加哥洛约拉大学的Helena Lopata进行的调查)的一部分受访者和变量伊利诺伊大学研究实验室为这项研究提供了数据库。原始研究的范围是由丧偶的妇女组成,这些妇女目前或最近曾获得某种形式的社会保障管理福利。此外,在调查时,这些妇女必须是芝加哥标准大都会统计区的居民。设计该研究的目的是使样本中充分代表来自五种社会保障管理局受益人类别的寡妇。这些类别包括:(1)有抚养子女的寡妇;(2)退休寡妇;(3)再婚寡妇;(4)有成年子女的寡妇;(5)“一次性总付”寡妇。数据是通过面对面访谈收集的。这项研究是对这些数据的辅助分析。被调查的亚组仅包括那些在丈夫去世后仍留寡妇的妇女(未加权病例数= 967)。在这些数据的分析中使用了多种回归/相关技术。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Chicago.;
  • 学科 Individual family studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1980
  • 页码 260 p.
  • 总页数 260
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 遥感技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号