首页> 外文学位 >COMMUNITY AND BUREAUCRACY IN RURAL CHINA: EVIDENCE FROM 'SECTARIAN CASES' (CHIAO-AN) IN KIANGSI, 1860-1895.
【24h】

COMMUNITY AND BUREAUCRACY IN RURAL CHINA: EVIDENCE FROM 'SECTARIAN CASES' (CHIAO-AN) IN KIANGSI, 1860-1895.

机译:中国农村的社区和文教机构:1860-1895年在江西的“ SECSECIAN CASE”(交安)证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In protest against government corruption and gentry exploitation local uprisings, then rebellion, burst out across the countryside. Ch'ing officials reacted ineffectively and, in any case, had few local control resources to fall back on. Consequently, the gentry organized militia corps to protect their property and to preserve the socio-political status quo. Their success at self-defense soon led to active involvement in county adminstrative affairs. Since involvement required funding, the gentry also took the opportunity to collect new fees and to draw revenue directly from the Ch'ing fiscal system.; Such were the exigencies created by mid-nineteenth century social disorder. But had the Ch'ing been weakened vis-a-vis its supporters as well as its opponents? Following the defeat of the Taipings in 1864, the Ch'ing moved to restore its former powers. Although other scholars have studied the T'ung-chih Restoration, they have not determined what the actual local government situation was. Only by pursuing data that reveals the daily operation of the bureaucracy and its interaction with the community can post-bellum state and society be evaluated from the local level.; In this sense, the Chiao-wu chiao-an tang ({lcub}The Tsungli Yamen{rcub} Archives on Christian affairs and on cases and disputes involving missionaries and converts) is of value because it allows us to consider two major questions. First, did the gentry continue to dominate local adminstration? Second, did the gentry instigate an anti-Christian movement, one that officials were powerless to prevent?; Information from Christian sect cases (chiao-an) that occurred in Kiangsi over a thirty-five year span indicates that county magistrates were often active and competent local administrators. In settling a wide-range of community disputes they had the assistance of "deputies" (wei-yuan), petty officials, soldiers, and sub-bureaucrats. Among the last group, ti-pao were particularly important. Ti-pao fulfilled numerous administrative duties, reporting major and minor crimes to the magistrate and serving as a conduit of information about community affairs. It appears that ti-pao were the magistrates' last organ of rural control: thus the gap left by a deteriorating pao-chia system was filled.; Chiao-an also offer a panoramic view of local society. Conflict between Christians and non-Christians was usually not over religious issues, but rather over secular matters such as unpaid rents, overdue loans, robbery, even rape and murder. A portion of such problems resulted in litigation and, finally, adjudication by the magistrate. Magistrates' generally thorough investigations and relatively equitable settlements minimized the possibility of renewed conflict, of continued missionary intervention, and of added complications for Sino-foreign relations.; From the vantage point of Christian sect cases, the Ch'ing adminstrative system and its personnel appears to have been quite resilient. Officials in Kiangsi responded to different crises with dispatch and efficiency: such action did much to re-establish government authority. Moreover, officials easily dealt with conflict involving Christians because (with the exception of Nanchang during the 1860's) there seems to have been no gentry-led or organized anti-Christian movement in Kiangsi.
机译:为了抗议政府的腐败和士绅的剥削,当地的起义,然后是叛乱,在整个农村爆发。清廷官员的反应不力,无论如何,都没有地方控制资源可以依靠。因此,士绅组织了民兵,以保护其财产并维护社会政治现状。他们在自卫方面的成功很快导致他们积极参与县级行政事务。由于参与需要资金,士绅还借此机会收取了新的费用,并直接从清政府的财政系统中获得收入。这就是19世纪中叶的社会混乱造成的迫切需求。但是,清朝相对于其支持者和反对者是否被削弱了?在1864年太平绅士击败后,清朝恢复了以前的势力。尽管其他学者已经研究了通济维新,但他们还没有确定地方政府的实际情况。只有通过数据揭示官僚机构的日常运作及其与社区的互动,才能从地方层面评估战后国家和社会。从这个意义上讲,“ Chiao-wu chiao-an tang”(有关基督教事务以及涉及传教士和cases依者的案件和争端的{Tsungli Yamen {rcub}档案馆)是有价值的,因为它使我们可以考虑两个主要问题。首先,士绅是否继续主导地方行政?第二,士绅是否发起了一场反基督教运动,官员们无力阻止这一运动?来自江西地区超过35年的基督教教派案例(迁安)的信息表明,县治安官通常是活跃且能干的地方行政人员。在解决广泛的社区纠纷中,他们得到了“代表”(魏远),小官,士兵和下官僚的帮助。在最后一组中,ti-pao特别重要。 Ti-pao履行了许多行政职责,向治安法官举报了重大罪行和轻罪,并作为有关社区事务的信息渠道。 ti-pao似乎是地方官员控制乡村的最后机构:因此,不断恶化的pao-chia系统留下的空白被填补。交安还提供了当地社会的全景。基督徒与非基督徒之间的冲突通常不是因为宗教问题,而是因为诸如未付租金,逾期贷款,抢劫,甚至强奸和谋杀等世俗事务。这些问题的一部分导致了诉讼,最后由裁判官裁决。地方法官通常进行彻底的调查和相对公平的解决方案,将重新发生冲突,继续进行传教士干预以及中外关系复杂化的可能性降到最低。从基督教宗派的有利地位来看,清朝的行政体系及其人员似乎具有相当的弹性。 Kiangsi的官员以调度和效率应对各种危机:这种行动对重建政府权威起到了很大作用。此外,官员们很容易处理涉及基督徒的冲突,因为(1860年代的南昌除外)在江西似乎没有由士绅领导或组织的反基督教运动。

著录项

  • 作者

    SWEETEN, ALAN RICHARD.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Davis.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Davis.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1980
  • 页码 345 p.
  • 总页数 345
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号