首页> 外文学位 >EXPORT PERFORMANCE OF TAIWAN, AND ITS CAUSES, DURING THE PERIOD OF 1965 TO 1971.
【24h】

EXPORT PERFORMANCE OF TAIWAN, AND ITS CAUSES, DURING THE PERIOD OF 1965 TO 1971.

机译:1965年至1971年期间台湾的出口表现及其成因。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This is an empirical study of Taiwan's export growth from 1965 to 1971. Constant-Market-Share analysis is employed. According to this model, a country's export growth can be partitioned into two parts: (1) a part that responds to world export growth in proportion to its constant share, and (2) another part that remains--a difference between actual export growth and that which is expected based on constant shares. The first part is identified as the world trade effect and the second part as competitiveness.;Competitiveness is also calculated and investigated for each commodity and in each market. In addition to calculation, examination, and comparison of an array of commodity and market competitive effects in the conventional CMS model, technological factors (i.e., capital-labor ratio, wage per man, consumer goods ratio, skill ratio, scale economies, and product differentiation) are used to explain the variations in competitiveness among commodities and markets.;The results of this study reveal that one-third of 1,437 million U.S. dollars export growth from 1965 to 1971, was in response to the world export growth. The remaining two-thirds was due to Taiwan's export competitiveness when beginning year shares were used. The world trade effect is partitioned into world effect (25 percent), the commodity effect (25 percent), the market effect (4 percent), and the commodity-market effect (8 percent). When the final year shares were used, the world trade effect enlarged to 46 percent as competitiveness shrunk to 54 percent.;A commodity (or market) with high world trade effect and high competitiveness is defined as Group A commodity (or market), one with low world trade effect but high competitiveness as Group B, one with high world trade effect but low competitiveness as Group C, and one with low world trade effect and low competitiveness as Group D. Textiles was typical of Group A commodity. Fish was typical of Group B commodity. Nonferrous metals belonged to Group C, and crude rubber belonged to Group D. The United States was typical of Group A market, and Singapore-Malaysia-Indonesia was typical of Group A market. Korea belonged to Group C and Iran belonged to Group D.;The world trade effect also can be partitioned into a world effect, commodity effect, and market effect. In calculating these effects, an order of calculation sensitivity problem appears; that is, the commodity effect which is calculated before a market effect calculation differs from one which is calculated after a market effect calculation. Therefore, two sets of commodity effect and market effect results may be calculated depending on the arbitrary choice by a researcher of the order of calculation. This study resolves the problem by introducing a commodity-market effect into the CMS model. A set of consistent world trade effects has been obtained regardless of the order of calculation of commodity or market effect. World trade effects are calculated and investigated for each commodity and in each market.;Technological factors can explain up to 69 percent of the variation among commodity competitiveness. Competitiveness based on shares of the initial year is positively associated with low wages and a low capital-labor ratio. However, the explanatory power of low wages and a low capital-labor ratio is lower for variations in competitiveness based on shares of the final year. These results suggest that a country may enjoy economic growth through the exportation of goods whose competitiveness is based on low wages and labor intensive methods. Furthermore, it appears that in a relatively short time a country may shift toward exporting goods whose competitiveness is no longer based on those characteristics.
机译:这是对1965年至1971年台湾出口增长的实证研究。采用了恒定市场份额分析。根据此模型,一个国家的出口增长可分为两部分:(1)对世界出口增长按其恒定份额成比例作出响应的部分;(2)剩下的另一部分-实际出口增长之间的差异以及基于恒定份额的期望值。第一部分确定为世界贸易效应,第二部分确定为竞争力。;还计算并调查了每种商品和每个市场的竞争力。除了计算,检验和比较常规CMS模型中的一系列商品和市场竞争效果外,技术因素(例如,资本劳动比率,人均工资,消费品比率,技能比率,规模经济和产品(本研究的结果表明,1965年至1971年,美国14.37亿美元的出口增长中有三分之一是对世界出口增长的反应。剩下的三分之二是由于使用年初股份时台湾的出口竞争力。世界贸易效应分为世界效应(25%),商品效应(25%),市场效应(4%)和商品市场效应(8%)。当使用最后一年的份额时,世界贸易效应扩大到46%,而竞争力下降到54%。;具有高世界贸易效应和高竞争力的商品(或市场)被定义为A组商品(或市场),世界贸易效应低,但与B组相比具有较高的竞争力;世界贸易效应高,但与C组相比,竞争力低。一种世界贸易影响低,与D组相比,竞争力低。纺织品是A组商品的典型代表。鱼是B组商品的典型代表。有色金属属于C组,粗橡胶属于D组。美国是A组市场的典型,而新加坡-马来西亚-印度尼西亚是A组市场的典型。韩国属于C组,伊朗属于D组。世界贸易效应也可以分为世界效应,商品效应和市场效应。在计算这些影响时,出现了一个计算灵敏度问题的顺序。即,在市场效果计算之前计算出的商品效果与在市场效果计算之后计算出的商品效果不同。因此,可以根据研究者对计算顺序的任意选择来计算两组商品效应和市场效应结果。本研究通过将商品市场效应引入CMS模型来解决该问题。无论商品的计算顺序或市场效应如何,都获得了一系列一致的世界贸易效应。对每种商品和每个市场的世界贸易影响进行了计算和调查。技术因素可以解释商品竞争力之间高达69%的差异。基于第一年份额的竞争力与低工资和低资本劳动比率成正相关。但是,低工资和低资本劳动比率的解释力对于基于最后一年份额的竞争力变化而言较低。这些结果表明,一个国家可以通过出口以低工资和劳动密集型方法为基础的商品来享受经济增长。此外,似乎一个国家可能在较短的时间内转向出口不再具有这些特征所具有的竞争力的商品。

著录项

  • 作者

    LEE, CHUAN-I.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Utah.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Utah.;
  • 学科 Economics Commerce-Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1981
  • 页码 222 p.
  • 总页数 222
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号