首页> 外文学位 >A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PERSONAL VALUE SYSTEMS OF COLLEGIATE BUSINESS STUDENTS, FACULTY AND BUSINESS LEADERS
【24h】

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PERSONAL VALUE SYSTEMS OF COLLEGIATE BUSINESS STUDENTS, FACULTY AND BUSINESS LEADERS

机译:普通商业学生,教职员工和商业领导者个人价值体系的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose. To determine relationships between collegiate business school students, faculty, and business leader values. The determination was based on value priorities and four comparisons were made: freshmen selecting a business administration major with seniors about to complete a business degree program, senior collegiate business students with faculty, senior collegiate business students with business leaders, and collegiate business school faculty with business leaders.;Methods and Sources. (a) The survey sample was composed of 92 freshmen and 9l senior business administration students, 82 business administration faculty members and 64 Arizona business leaders. (b) The Value Survey, Form D, by M. Rokeach was used to secure a statement of the value priorities of the respondents. Nonparametric statistical procedures were used to test the hypotheses at the .05 level of significance. (c) Between-group relationships were tested by the Kruskal-Wallis One-way analysis of variance.;Summary of Findings. (a) The personal value systems of the freshmen and senior students were similar. Only 3 of 36 values were found to be significantly different. It could be inferred that the institution does not have a noticeable impact upon the students' values. (b) Eleven significant value differences were found between senior collegiate business students and business faculty. Ambitious, loving, polite, a comfortable life and pleasure were preferred by the students; whereas the faculty ranked higher capable, courageous, logical, equality and national security. It was concluded the students and faculty values were essentially homogeneous. (c) Nineteen significant value differences were found between senior students and business leaders. The findings indicate that overall students place high value on personalistic and humanistic values; whereas business leaders place a high emphasis on moralistic and pragmatic values. It was concluded that by recognizing this difference in value orientation, business schools and business organizations may have increased success in achieving their goals. (d) There were 10 significant value differences between faculty and business leaders. The differences tend in the expected direction--business leaders being more ambitious, courageous, imaginative; whereas faculty members are more helpful, loving and broadminded.;General Recommendation. Business organizations should recognize that different value orientation reveals basic differences in individual on-the-job attitude and behaviors.
机译:目的。确定大学商学院学生,教职员工和商业领袖价值观之间的关系。该决定基于价值优先级,并进行了四项比较:新生选择即将完成商业学位课程的高级商务管理专业,高级大学商学院的学生,高级大学商学院的业务负责人以及大学商学院的高级管理人员。商业领袖。;方法和来源。 (a)调查样本由92名新生和9l高级商务管理专业学生,82名商务管理系成员和64位亚利桑那州商务主管组成。 (b)利用M. Rokeach的D表进行的价值调查,以确保对受访者的价值优先事项作出陈述。使用非参数统计程序以0.05的显着性水平检验假设。 (c)组间关系通过Kruskal-Wallis单向方差分析进行检验。 (a)新生和大四学生的个人价值体系相似。发现36个值中只有3个有显着差异。可以推断该机构对学生的价值观没有明显的影响。 (b)在高等商学院的商业学生和商学院之间发现了11个重大的价值差异。学生们喜欢野心勃勃,充满爱心,有礼貌,舒适的生活和快乐;而教师的能力,勇气,逻辑,平等和国家安全则更高。可以得出结论,学生和教职员工的价值观本质上是同质的。 (c)在高年级学生和商业领袖之间发现了19个重大的价值差异。研究结果表明,总体而言,学生对个人和人文价值观高度重视;而企业领导者则高度重视道德和务实的价值观。结论是,通过认识到价值取向的这种差异,商学院和商业组织可能在实现其目标方面取得了更大的成功。 (d)教师和企业领导者之间存在10个重大的价值差异。差异趋向于预期的方向-商业领袖更具野心,勇气和想象力;而教师则更乐于助人,充满爱心和开阔胸怀。商业组织应认识到,不同的价值取向揭示了个人在职态度和行为的基本差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    MILLER, WILLIAM EDWARD.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Business education.
  • 学位 Educat.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 117 p.
  • 总页数 117
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号