首页> 外文学位 >THE BATTLE FOR TRUTH: FOUCAULT, LIBERATION THEOLOGY AND THE INSURRECTION OF SUBJUGATED KNOWLEDGES.
【24h】

THE BATTLE FOR TRUTH: FOUCAULT, LIBERATION THEOLOGY AND THE INSURRECTION OF SUBJUGATED KNOWLEDGES.

机译:真相的战斗:偶然,解放神学和对被误解的知识的灌输。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation I examine a given body of literature--black, feminist, Latin American and political theologies--and attempt to delineate its epistemic shift as well as criticize aspects of it that reflect a reliance on oppressive modes of thought. I conclude thesis that liberation theology is itself an insurrection of subjugated knowledges. To identify liberation theology explicity as an insurrection of subjugated knowledge, and thus approach it with Michel Foucault's genealogical method, provides a rationale for its central themes--a pretheoretical commitment to the oppressed as the focus of theological reflection, and a turn to the practical category of liberation as the criterion of the truth of Christianity. This approach to liberation theology incorporates the three elements of genealogy described by Foucault: the preservation of memories of conflict; the exposition of excluded contents and meanings; a turn to strategic thought, the struggle between these knowledges and presently dominant ones.;I conclude that the tension between relativism and universalism, between skepticism and normative claims, is constitutive of liberation thought. Liberation thought is the life and death practical struggle between nihilism and commitment, between despair and hope. I contend that skepticism must be maintained, even by theologians, that the events of the twentieth century make it impossible to hold any assurances about the possibility of knowledge and liberation.;Concomitant with the method of genealogy is an alternate understanding of truth, one that does not require the same sort of exclusion operative in more traditional apparatuses of power/knowledge. My delineation of the type of truth claims appropriate to liberation thought is aided by an examination of Richard Rorty's contrast of two types of philosophy and the comparison of this alternate style of critical reflection with Jurgen Habermas' concept of critical theory.
机译:在这篇论文中,我研究了给定的文学体系,包括黑人,女权主义者,拉丁美洲和政治神学,并试图描述其认识论转变,并批评它反映了对压迫性思维方式的依赖的某些方面。我的结论是,解放神学本身就是被屈服的知识的暴动。将解放神学的显性认定为对被屈服的知识的暴动,然后采用米歇尔·福柯的家谱方法对其进行处理,为其核心主题提供了理论依据-对被压迫者的前理论承诺,即作为神学反思的焦点,并转向了实践解放类别是基督教真理的标准。这种解放神学的方法包含了福柯所描述的家谱的三个要素:冲突记忆的保存;排除内容和含义的说明;转向战略思想,即这些知识与当前知识之间的斗争。我得出结论,相对主义与普遍主义之间,怀疑论与规范主张之间的紧张关系是解放思想的组成部分。解放思想是虚无主义与承诺,绝望与希望之间的生死实践斗争。我认为,即使是神学家,也必须保持怀疑态度,即二十世纪的事件使人们不可能对知识和解放的可能性作出任何保证。与家谱方法相伴随的是对真理的另一种理解,即不需要在更传统的权力/知识设备中执行相同类型的排除。我对适合于解放思想的真理主张类型的描述,是通过考察理查德·罗蒂(Richard Rorty)对两种哲学类型的对比以及这种批判性反思风格与尤尔根·哈贝马斯(Jurgen Habermas)的批判理论概念的比较而得到的。

著录项

  • 作者

    WELCH, SHARON DIANE.;

  • 作者单位

    Vanderbilt University.;

  • 授予单位 Vanderbilt University.;
  • 学科 Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 313 p.
  • 总页数 313
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号