首页> 外文学位 >EFFECTS OF SOME MACHINING VARIABLES IN LATHE FACING USING A PROFILOMETER AND SPECKLE CONTRAST METHODS TO MEASURE SURFACE ROUGHNESS.
【24h】

EFFECTS OF SOME MACHINING VARIABLES IN LATHE FACING USING A PROFILOMETER AND SPECKLE CONTRAST METHODS TO MEASURE SURFACE ROUGHNESS.

机译:使用轮廓仪和斑点对比法测量车削表面粗糙度时某些加工变量对车削的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A review of literature indicated that the technique that has found general usage and widespread acceptance for the measurement of surface roughness is the use of a profilometer. This instrument has been found to have at least two limitations in measuring surface roughness. First, there is the limitation associated with the radius of the stylus that prevents an accurate profiling of the surface. Second, the instrument tends to distort the real nature of the image of the solid surface because the vertical magnification is greater than the horizontal magnification.;The variables whose effect on the resulting surface roughness was investigated were: the cutting speed, the feed rate, the depth of cut and the surface speed per minute.;Two different measures of the resulting speckle contrast were used. First the surface roughness was characterized by the arithmetic average of the speckle intensity, resulting from translating the rough sample across a (He-Ne) laser beam. Second, the surface roughness was characterized at each of twenty randomly selected points; across one of its major diameters, by the resulting speckle intensity.;The results indicated that neither the profilometer nor the average speckle contrast were adequate techniques to measure surface roughness in the facing of medium carbon steel. The results also indicated that the point-by-point method of characterizing surface roughness using speckle contrast, is a useful method in determining the effects of the machining variables on surface roughness in the facing of medium carbon steel. The study also pointed out the need for developing a better method of measuring surface finish than the profilometer technique.;Because of these limitations, substantial research has been reported in the literature on optical techniques to replace the profilometer. The main objective of this study was to compare the profilometer results with the results of a surface roughness measuring technique using speckle contrast in the facing of medium carbon steel.
机译:文献综述表明,已发现用于表面粗糙度测量的一般用途和广泛接受的技术是轮廓仪。已经发现该仪器在测量表面粗糙度方面具有至少两个限制。首先,与触控笔的半径相关联的限制会阻止表面的精确轮廓化。其次,由于垂直放大率大于水平放大率,该仪器往往会扭曲实体表面图像的真实性质。;研究了对最终表面粗糙度产生影响的变量:切削速度,进给速度,切割深度和每分钟表面速度。;使用了两种不同的方法来测量斑点对比度。首先,表面粗糙度的特征在于通过将粗糙样品平移到(He-Ne)激光束上而产生的斑点强度的算术平均值。其次,在20个随机选择的点分别对表面粗糙度进行了表征。结果表明,轮廓仪和平均斑点对比度都不是测量中碳钢表面粗糙度的合适技术。结果还表明,使用斑点对比度表征表面粗糙度的逐点方法,对于确定加工变量对中碳钢表面的表面粗糙度的影响是一种有用的方法。该研究还指出需要开发一种比表面轮廓仪技术更好的表面光洁度测量方法。由于这些局限性,在光学技术方面已有大量文献报道可替代表面轮廓仪。这项研究的主要目的是将轮廓仪的结果与使用中碳钢表面上的斑点对比的表面粗糙度测量技术的结果进行比较。

著录项

  • 作者

    BOUBEKRI, NOURREDINE.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;
  • 学科 Engineering Mechanical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 176 p.
  • 总页数 176
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号