首页> 外文学位 >THEORIES OF TRUTH, VALUE, AND RATIONALITY IN LUKACS, ALTHUSSER, AND HABERMAS (Gyorgy Lukacs, Louis Althusser, Juergen Habermas).
【24h】

THEORIES OF TRUTH, VALUE, AND RATIONALITY IN LUKACS, ALTHUSSER, AND HABERMAS (Gyorgy Lukacs, Louis Althusser, Juergen Habermas).

机译:卢卡奇,阿尔都塞和哈贝马斯的真相,价值和合理性理论(乔治·卢卡奇,路易斯·阿尔都塞,尤尔根·哈贝马斯)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One thesis of this dissertation is that adequate analysis of epistemological questions requires a sociological theory that begins its theory of truth with the notion of action and praxis rather than with the notion of abstract ideas.; The early positivists subscribed to a theory of truth resting on the premise of subject-object differentiation. Both Kant and Hegel challenged the early positivists' premise and offered a theory of truth emphasizing the creation of the object by the activities of the subject. Marx applied the notion of genesis to social reality and offered a theory of truth that is realized through the processes of praxis. According to Marx's theory of truth, genesis can be conscious or unconscious, depending upon the democratic or undemocratic power structure of society. Marx's notion of an "unconscious genesis" represents an Aufhebung of both structuralist-positivist and hermeneutical-phenomenological concepts. In this sense, Marx's theory is a critique of instrumental reason. Economistic readings of Marx, however, often confine the notion of praxis to instrumental action that leads to a technocratic consciousness. Althusser's structuralism belongs to this tradition.; Lukacs's theory of reification, his rejection of the dialectic of nature, and his emphasis on the specificity of proletarian self-consciousness challenge a "positivistic" Marxism and pave the way for critical theory.; For Habermas, the genesis of social reality is composed of both instrumental action and symbolic interaction. According to Habermas, practical rationality cannot be defined in terms of scientific knowledge; practical rationality can be defined only in a democratic context involving the decision of people engaged in free communication. Critical theory, as the unity of reason and interest, aims at liberation of people from systematic distortions of communication.; The central questions discussed during the analysis of the possibility of a critical theory include: the order of categories, the theory of fetishism, the theory of Language, the definition of "consciousness" and "unconsciousness", the relation of individual to society, the meaning of meaning in social reality, social ontology, the status of the dialectic, and the relations between knowledge and interest and the whole stance of the sociology of knowledge.
机译:本论文的一个论点是,对认识论问题的充分分析需要一种社会学理论,该理论从行动和实践的概念而非抽象概念的概念开始其真理理论。早期的实证主义者赞成基于主观与客体差异的前提下的真理理论。康德和黑格尔都对早期的实证主义者的前提提出了挑战,并提出了一个真理理论,强调通过主体的活动来创造客体。马克思将起源的概念应用到社会现实中,并提供了通过实践过程实现的真理理论。根据马克思的真理理论,创世可以是有意识的或无意识的,取决于社会的民主或不民主的权力结构。马克思的“无意识的起源”概念代表了结构主义-实证主义和诠释学-现象学概念的双重融合。从这个意义上说,马克思的理论是对工具理性的批判。然而,对马克思的经济学解读经常将实践的概念局限于工具行为中,这种行为导致了技术官僚意识。阿尔都塞的结构主义属于这一传统。卢卡奇的理论化,对自然辩证法的拒绝以及对无产阶级自我意识特殊性的强调,挑战了“实证的”马克思主义,并为批判理论铺平了道路。对于哈贝马斯来说,社会现实的发生既包括工具性行动,也包括象征性互动。哈贝马斯认为,实践合理性不能用科学知识来定义。只有在涉及参与自由交流的人的决定的民主背景下,才能定义实际的合理性。批判理论是理性与利益的统一,旨在使人们从系统的交流扭曲中解放出来。在分析批判理论的可能性时讨论的中心问题包括:类别顺序,拜物教理论,语言理论,“意识”和“无意识”的定义,个人与社会的关系,社会现实中的意义含义,社会本体论,辩证法的地位以及知识与利益之间的关系以及知识社会学的整体立场。

著录项

  • 作者

    SAIEDI, NADER.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 463 p.
  • 总页数 463
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学理论与方法论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号