首页> 外文学位 >THE GENESIS OF POWER: CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS IN INDONESIA DURING THE REVOLUTION FOR INDEPENDENCE, 1945-1949.
【24h】

THE GENESIS OF POWER: CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS IN INDONESIA DURING THE REVOLUTION FOR INDEPENDENCE, 1945-1949.

机译:权力的产生:1945-1949年独立革命期间印度尼西亚的民航与军事关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this dissertation is to explain why the Indonesian military as early as 1950 had secured an important place in the Indonesian political arena. The author argues that post-revolutionary civil military relations can be explained by the interaction of two important factors during the revolution for independence, 1945-1949, the involvement of the Indonesian military in politics since its inception, and the weakness of civilian governmental and political institutions. The first factor includes three sub-factors: (1) the self-creation of the military when the civilian government was reluctant to raise an army in the early days of independence; (2) the political behavior of the elected military Commander; and (3) the political experience of the military in conducting a Military Government following the surrender of the civilian government after the Dutch army attacked and occupied the Republic area.;The last chapter of the dissertation surveys post-revolutionary Indonesian civil-military relations. It suggests that after the transfer of sovereignty in 1949 it was hoped that the government would be able to control the military. But the constant bickering at that period among the civilian politicians made it impossible for the government to control the military. Military officers continued their political role, especially after the proclamation of the martial law in 1957. The political role of the military was formally recognized in 1959 when President Sukarno took over the government. Between 1959 and 1965 there were three important political actors in Indonesia: Sukarno, the military and Indonesian Communist Party. Following the purge of the Communist Party in 1965 and the demise of Sukarno in 1966, the military alone stood in control of Indonesian politics.;The second factor is the weakness of civilian governmental and political institutions. there are two reasons for this. In Indonesia, unlike in India where the British Raj created the Indian Civil Service and allowed the Indian Congress Party to develop long before independence, the Dutch in Indonesia denied the nationalist movement an opportunity to grow. The immediate cause of system weakness was the sudden change in November 1945 from the American-style presidential system to a European parliamentary system. The new system allowed the creation of many parties. The constant bickering among the parties in and out of government under the ever-present threat of Dutch annihilation of the newly-born Republic not only caused the government to lose control over the already-politicized military, but also convinced the officers to pursue their own policies of fighting for independence.
机译:本文的目的是解释为什么印尼军队早在1950年就在印尼政治舞台上获得了重要地位。作者认为,革命后的民间军事关系可以用1945年至1949年独立革命期间两个重要因素的相互作用,印尼军事力量自成立以来参与政治活动以及平民政府和政治力量的弱点来解释。机构。第一个因素包括三个子因素:(1)在独立初期民政政府不愿增兵的情况下,军队的自我创造; (二)当选军事指挥官的政治行为; (3)在荷兰军队进攻并占领共和国地区后,在民政府投降后,军方领导军政府的政治经验。论文的最后一章概述了革命后的印尼民军关系。它表明,在1949年主权移交之后,希望政府能够控制军队。但是在那个时期,平民政客之间的不断争吵使政府无法控制军队。军官继续发挥政治作用,尤其是在1957年颁布戒严令之后。在1959年苏加诺总统接管政府之后,军人的政治作用得到了正式承认。 1959年至1965年之间,印度尼西亚有三个重要的政治角色:苏加诺,军人和印度尼西亚共产党。继1965年共产党的大清洗和1966年苏加诺(Sukarno)的灭亡之后,仅靠军方就控制了印度尼西亚的政治。第二个因素是平民政府和政治机构的薄弱环节。有两个原因。在印度尼西亚,与印度不同,英国拉贾(Raj)建立印度公务员制度并允许印度国会党在独立之前就发展,而印度尼西亚的荷兰人则否认民族主义运动有发展的机会。制度薄弱的直接原因是1945年11月从美国式总统制突然转变为欧洲议会制。新系统允许创建许多政党。在新生的荷兰共和国遭到荷兰歼灭的不断威胁下,政党内外各派之间的争吵不断,不仅使政府失去对已经政治化的军队的控制,而且还说服军官追求自己的政权争取独立的政策。

著录项

  • 作者

    SAID, SALIM.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 314 p.
  • 总页数 314
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号