首页> 外文学位 >Wielding the human rights weapon: The United States, Soviet Union, and private citizens, 1975--1989.
【24h】

Wielding the human rights weapon: The United States, Soviet Union, and private citizens, 1975--1989.

机译:挥舞着人权武器:美国,苏联和私人公民,1975--1989年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation will explore the complexities of the role human rights played in U.S.-Soviet relations from 1975 to 1989 through the prism of globalization. It will describe how Western private citizens, Soviet dissenters, and members of Congress exploited the language of Final Act (Helsinki Accords) to forge a transnational network committed to globalizing the issue of Soviet human rights violations. This development challenged bureaucratic discretion in ways that gave the Carter and Reagan administrations little choice but to challenge Soviet internal behavior in forthright fashion. Instead of viewing transnational activities as a threat to their expertise, many officials in each administration made working with and supporting non-governmental groups an integral element of their approach to undermining the international and internal legitimacy of the USSR. Utilizing Soviet internal documents available in English, this dissertation will also explain why many Soviet policymakers feared the human rights critiques of dissenters and Western private citizens just as much, if not more, than the statements of U.S. politicians.;Without losing sight of the pivotal role private citizens and Congress played in tarnishing the international reputation of the Soviet Union, this work will also offer an in-depth comparison of the Carter and Reagan administrations' efforts to promote human rights in USSR. It will argue that a transnational perspective calls into question many of the standard interpretations of each administration's efforts to promote human rights in the Soviet Union. In the case of the USSR, a transnational framework complicates arguments that focus on the inherent weaknesses of Soviet dissent during the early to mid 1980s. After exploring these topics, this work will outline the limitations of "constructivist" accounts of how international human rights "norms" shaped Soviet reform efforts after Mikhail Gorbachev became General Secretary.
机译:我的论文将通过全球化的视角探讨人权在1975年至1989年的美苏关系中所扮演的角色的复杂性。它将描述西方私人公民,苏联持不同政见者和国会议员如何利用《最后文件》(《赫尔辛基协定》)的语言建立一个致力于将苏联侵犯人权问题全球化的跨国网络。这种发展挑战了官僚的自由裁量权,给了卡特和里根政府别无选择,只能以直截了当的方式挑战苏联的内部行为。每个政府的许多官员并没有将跨国活动视为对其专业知识的威胁,而是将与非政府组织的合作和支持作为破坏苏联的国际和内部合法性的方法的组成部分。本文利用英文的苏联内部文件,也将解释为什么许多苏联政策制定者担心对异议者和西方私人公民的人权批评与美国政客的陈述一样多,甚至更多。私人公民和国会在破坏苏联的国际声誉中所扮演的角色,这项工作还将与卡特和里根政府在苏联促进人权的努力进行深入的比较。它将提出一种跨国观点,质疑每个政府为促进苏联人权所做的许多标准解释。以苏联为例,跨国框架使论点变得更加复杂,这些论点着重于1980年代初至中期苏联异议人士的固有弱点。在探讨了这些主题之后,这项工作将概述“建构主义”说明在米哈伊尔·戈尔巴乔夫(Mikhail Gorbachev)担任总书记之后国际人权“规范”如何影响苏联的改革努力中的局限性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Peterson, Christian Philip.;

  • 作者单位

    Ohio University.;

  • 授予单位 Ohio University.;
  • 学科 History United States.;History Russian and Soviet.;Political Science International Law and Relations.;History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 592 p.
  • 总页数 592
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号