首页> 外文学位 >PUBLICLY FINANCED R&D CAPITAL, R&D TAX POLICY, AND PRODUCTIVITY EFFECTS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR.
【24h】

PUBLICLY FINANCED R&D CAPITAL, R&D TAX POLICY, AND PRODUCTIVITY EFFECTS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR.

机译:公共融资的研发资本,研发税收政策以及对私营部门的生产率影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation I evaluate the federal government's direct and indirect role in stimulating private R&D investment and productivity by estimating a translogarithmic cost function under different assumptions of firms' behavior and market equilibrium conditions. First, I study the existence and extent of an externality from publicly financed R&D capital and the way it affects the cost structure of manufacturing industries at the two-digit level. Second, I provide econometric evidence of the effectiveness of R&D tax policy in stimulating privately funded R&D and output growth. Finally, I evaluate these policies by estimating the social rate of return of publicly funded R&D and the additional privately funded R&D expenditures generated by the R&D tax policy relative to the foregone government tax revenues.; In contrast to the existing literature, my findings show that given an industry's output, publicly financed R&D capital reduces the production cost in all industries in the sample, suggesting the existence of an externality from publicly financed R&D. Moreover, when output is allowed to adjust, publicly financed R&D causes output to increase and cost per unit of output to decline. Labor input is a weak complement of publicly financed R&D while intermediate inputs are substitutes. Also, publicly funded R&D crowds out physical capital in all industries, induces private R&D in some of the major receivers of publicly funded R&D support, and crowds out private R&D in the remaining industries. Finally, I calculate that the social rate of return of publicly funded R&D for the industries in the sample ranges from 6% to 23%. I also estimate that the incremental R&D tax credit introduced by the Economic Recovery Act of 1981 has a rather moderate effect in stimulating R&D. At a given level of output, a 1% increase of incremental R&D tax credit induces {dollar}1.3 of additional R&D expenditures per dollar of lost government tax revenue. However, when the induced output effect is considered, the stimulus to private R&D is much higher.
机译:在这篇论文中,我通过在企业行为和市场均衡条件的不同假设下估算对数成本函数,评估了联邦政府在刺激私人研发投资和生产率方面的直接和间接作用。首先,我研究了来自公共研发资金的外部性的存在和程度,以及它在两位数水平上对制造业成本结构的影响。其次,我提供了计量经济学证据,证明了研发税收政策在刺激私人资助的研发和产出增长方面的有效性。最后,我通过估算公共资助的研发的社会收益率以及相对于已被放弃的政府税收的研发税收政策所产生的私人资助的额外研发支出来评估这些政策。与现有文献相反,我的发现表明,给定一个行业的产出,公共资助的研发资本会降低样本中所有行业的生产成本,这表明存在公共资助的研发的外部性。此外,当允许调整产出时,由公共资助的研发活动会导致产出增加而单位产出成本下降。劳动力投入是政府资助的研发的薄弱补充,而中间投入是替代品。此外,由公共资助的研发会挤出所有行业的有形资本,在一些由公共资助的研发支持的主要接受者中诱发私人研发,而将其余行业的私人研发排除在外。最后,我计算出样本中各行业的公共资助研发的社会回报率在6%至23%之间。我还估计,1981年《经济复苏法》引入的增量研发税收抵免在刺激研发方面具有相当适度的作用。在给定的产出水平下,每增加1美元的政府税收收入,增加的研发税收抵免额增加1%,将导致{R}额外增加1.3美元的研发支出。但是,当考虑诱导的产出效应时,对私人研发的刺激要高得多。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY.;

  • 授予单位 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY.;
  • 学科 Economics General.; Economics Commerce-Business.; American Studies.; Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 PH.D.
  • 年度 1992
  • 页码 225 p.
  • 总页数 225
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学;贸易经济;政治理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号