首页> 外文学位 >Burke, Campbell, Johnson, and Priestley: A rhetorical analysis of four British pamphlets of the American Revolution.
【24h】

Burke, Campbell, Johnson, and Priestley: A rhetorical analysis of four British pamphlets of the American Revolution.

机译:伯克(Burke),坎贝尔(Campbell),约翰逊(Johnson)和普里斯特利(Priestley):对美国革命的四本英国小册子的修辞分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study was undertaken to increase knowledge of an important but largely unexamined genre of public discourse in the late eighteenth century: the political pamphlet. The four texts selected were Edmund Burke's A Letter to the Sheriffs of Bristol, George Campbell's The Nature, Extent, and Importance of the Duty of Allegiance, Samuel Johnson's Taxation No Tyranny, and Joseph Priestley's An Address to Protestant Dissenters.;A revised version of neo-Aristotelian rhetorical criticism was designed, providing a synthesis of the theories of Aristotle and Kenneth Burke. The new methodology proposes that the occasion of a rhetorical text is not only a matter of the historical and social conditions that contributed to its composition and reception, but that the rhetor will reconstruct the occasion within the text itself. There will be a relationship between the reconstructed occasion and the arguments employed in the text; this will not, however, exclude a relationship between the arguments and external conditions. Kenneth Burke's system of dramatistic analysis (the "pentad") offers a technique for the description of textually reconstructed occasions. Finally, identification provides a basic rhetorical principle to explain the operation of the traditional forms of argument described by Aristotle: ethos, logos, and pathos. All appeals, whether explicit or implicit, may be described in terms of identification or dissociation.;The four pamphlets demonstrate a variety of rhetorical techniques. The most common include extended and detailed refutation, appeals to such traditional aspects of the British political system as the consituation and virtual representation, a reliance upon historical and legal precedents for the foundation for rational arguments, an identification between civil unrest and madness, and the characterization of opponents in highly negative terms. All four texts illustrate clearly that the individual rhetor's reconstruction of the occasion is a central aspect of the overall argument.
机译:进行这项研究是为了增加人们对18世纪晚期公共话语一种重要但未经审查的体裁的认识:政治小册子。所选择的四个文本是埃德蒙·伯克(Edmund Burke)的《给布里斯托尔的治安官的信》,乔治·坎贝尔(George Campbell)的《效忠的性质,范围和重要性》,塞缪尔·约翰逊(Samuel Johnson)的《暴政》,《暴政》和约瑟夫·普里斯特利(Joseph Priestley)的《对新教异议者的讲话》。设计了新亚里士多德的修辞批评,对亚里士多德和肯尼思·伯克的理论进行了综合。新的方法论认为,修辞文本的场合不仅是构成其接受和接受的历史和社会条件的问题,而且修辞者将在文本本身内重构场合。重构的场合与文本中使用的论点之间将存在关系;但是,这并不排除参数与外部条件之间的关系。肯尼斯·伯克(Kenneth Burke)的戏剧分析系统(“五人制”)提供了一种用于描述文本重构场合的技术。最后,认同提供了一种基本的修辞学原理,用以解释亚里斯多德所描述的传统论证形式的运作:精神,徽标和悲痛。所有的呼吁,无论是明示的还是隐含的,都可以用识别或分离来描述。四本小册子展示了各种修辞手法。最常见的包括扩展和详细的驳斥,对英国政治制度的传统方面的诉求,例如宪法和虚拟代表制,对历史和法律先例的依赖,以作为理性论证的基础,对内乱和疯狂之间的认同以及以高度消极的方式描述对手的特征。所有这四个文本清楚地表明,个别修辞者对此场合的重构是整体论证的中心方面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gellis, Mark.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Literature English.;Language General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 285 p.
  • 总页数 285
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号