首页> 外文学位 >Pharmaceutical development and marketing: A comparative analysis of the opinions of managed care pharmacists and pharmaceutical industry marketing executives.
【24h】

Pharmaceutical development and marketing: A comparative analysis of the opinions of managed care pharmacists and pharmaceutical industry marketing executives.

机译:药品开发和营销:对管理式护理药剂师和制药行业营销主管的意见进行比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this research was to compare perceptions and opinions of managed care pharmacists and marketing executives of U.S. pharmaceutical companies regarding current and future services, marketing practices, and research strategies of the pharmaceutical industry.; Questionnaires were sent to 300 managed care pharmacists and 200 drug industry executives randomly selected from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy membership list. Follow-up mailings were used to increase response rate. The survey instrument contained over 100 questions pertaining to the role of pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs), journal advertising, direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising, drug research strategies, and services and benefits provided by the drug industry. Overall, 170 of 500 questionnaires (34% from both groups) were completed and returned.; According to pharmacists, pharmaceutical companies should decrease the use of traditional PSRs and "hard-sell" techniques, increase the use of specialty representatives, and discontinue drug sampling. Opinions of executives differed in that they want more contact with pharmacists and want to use traditional PSRs to promote products to physicians.; The two groups agreed that professional journal advertisements do not influence formulary decisions but are useful for announcing new drugs. Pharmacists wanted journal advertisements to be more accurate and less promotional. Pharmacists felt DTC advertising results in unnecessary prescribing by physicians, misleads patients, and increases drug utilization. Executives believed DTC advertisements improve patient knowledge and compliance and that patients should have a say about which drugs they take.; The study groups agreed that the two most important types of research needed from industry were clinical efficacy and outcomes studies, and that funding of pharmacoeconomic research should come primarily from pharmaceutical companies. Both groups agreed that value-added services have some influence on the formulary decision-making process. The most valued services and/or benefits identified by managed care pharmacists and executives were "cost effective" and "low cost" drugs, educational programs, and information services.; The results of this study indicate that while there are some areas of agreement between managed care pharmacists and industry executives, their perceptions of the current environment and opinions of future needs differ significantly.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较美国医药公司的管理式护理药剂师和营销主管对当前和未来的服务,营销实践以及制药行业的研究策略的看法和看法。问卷被发送给300名管理护理药剂师和200名制药行业负责人,这些管理人员是从管理护理药剂学院会员名单中随机选择的。后续邮件被用来提高回应率。调查工具包含100多个问题,这些问题与药品销售代表(PSR)的作用,期刊广告,直接面向消费者(DTC)的广告,药品研究策略以及药品行业提供的服务和收益有关。总共完成了500份问卷中的170份(两组的34%)已完成并返回。根据药剂师的说法,制药公司应减少使用传统的PSR和“硬卖”技术,增加对专业代表的使用,并中止药物采样。高管的观点不同,他们希望与药剂师更多地接触,并希望使用传统的PSR将产品推销给医生。两组同意,专业期刊广告不会影响配方决定,但对于宣布新药很有用。药剂师希望期刊广告更准确,促销更少。药剂师认为DTC广告会导致医生不必要的开处方,误导患者并增加药物利用率。高管们相信DTC广告可以提高患者的知识水平和依从性,患者应该对自己服用的药物有发言权。研究小组一致认为,行业需要的两个最重要的研究类型是临床功效和结果研究,药物经济学研究的资金应主要来自制药公司。两组都同意,增值服务对配方决策过程有一定影响。被管理的护理药剂师和管理人员确定的最有价值的服务和/或收益是“具有成本效益”和“低成本”的药品,教育计划和信息服务。这项研究的结果表明,尽管托管护理药剂师和行业高管之间在某些方面达成协议,但他们对当前环境的看法和对未来需求的看法差异很大。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hoffman, Kirk H.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Kansas City.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Kansas City.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Marketing.; Health Sciences Pharmacy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 238 p.
  • 总页数 238
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;药剂学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号