首页> 外文学位 >A backcast methodology for planning and justification of advanced manufacturing technology acquisition: A model of capability building process.
【24h】

A backcast methodology for planning and justification of advanced manufacturing technology acquisition: A model of capability building process.

机译:用于计划和证明先进制造技术的合理性的后退方法论:能力建设过程的模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Inadequacies of conventional investment justification methodologies in Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT) cases are well known. The inadequacies mainly stem from exclusion of qualitative and "intangible" factors when evaluating AMT investment proposals. To address the problem, a framework of AMT planning and justification is presented in this paper. The framework takes a 'backcast' approach, in which the AMT acquisition is modelled as an essential effort in a process of building manufacturing capabilities for a firm's long term competitiveness positioning. The intangible benefits associated with AMT acquisitions are explicitly considered and modelled as a set of manufacturing capability measures. Non-financial, or activity-based performance measures are adapted. Planning of AMT acquisition is modelled as a "backcast" process consisting of identification of capability upgrading needs, or 'capability gaps', in manufacturing bases, with respect to manufacturing strategic objectives, and selection of appropriate AMT programs to close the gaps. Selection and justification of AMT program alternatives is modelled as a multiple criteria decision making process. Factors of actual concern may be firm-specific. The range of factors considered in this paper includes level of capability upgrade (% of gap closure), demand on strategic resources in terms of financial constraint, implementation time and learning period, and compatibility of AMT candidates to a firm's organizational infrastructure. Quantitative evaluation of subjective factors are attempted by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy set methods. Multiple criteria decision making is modelled by the Compromise Programming approach. The framework enables decision making on AMT investment to be based on integrated programs rather than isolated projects. Implementation of the framework is shown to be based on activity-based performance measures in a firm.
机译:众所周知,先进制造技术(AMT)案例中传统投资论证方法的不足之处。不足之处主要是由于在评估AMT投资建议时排除了定性和“无形”因素。为了解决这个问题,本文提出了AMT规划和论证框架。该框架采用“后退”方法,在该方法中,AMT收购被建模为在为公司的长期竞争力定位建立制造能力的过程中的一项基本工作。与AMT收购相关的无形收益被明确考虑并建模为一组制造能力度量。调整非财务或基于活动的绩效指标。 AMT采购计划的建模是一个“后退”过程,包括确定制造基地中与制造战略目标有关的能力升级需求或“能力差距”,并选择适当的AMT计划来弥补差距。 AMT计划替代方案的选择和论证被建模为多准则决策过程。实际关注的因素可能是公司特定的。本文考虑的因素范围包括能力提升水平(差距缩小的百分比),对财务资源,实施时间和学习期限的战略资源需求,以及AMT候选人与公司组织基础结构的兼容性。主观因素的定量评估尝试采用层次分析法(AHP)和模糊集方法。多准则决策是通过“折衷编程”方法建模的。该框架使有关AMT投资的决策能够基于综合计划而不是孤立的项目。事实证明,该框架的实施是基于企业中基于活动的绩效指标。

著录项

  • 作者

    Liu, Zheng.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Windsor (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Windsor (Canada).;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.;Engineering Industrial.
  • 学位 M.A.Sc.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 209 p.
  • 总页数 209
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;一般工业技术;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号