首页> 外文学位 >Theoretical models for the analysis of the banking system and financial repression in less-developed nations.
【24h】

Theoretical models for the analysis of the banking system and financial repression in less-developed nations.

机译:用于分析欠发达国家银行体系和金融抑制的理论模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A common feature of financial sectors in the third world is the presence of financial repression: the gamut of policies, regulations and restrictions that inhibit financial intermediaries from operating to their full potential. It has been argued that a common feature of financially repressed economies is a very low real interest rate. However, many financial sector studies have not yielded conclusive evidence that levels of real interest rates have systematically affected growth and savings rates. This paper examines reserve requirements, in lieu of real interest rates, as a policy variable indicative of financial repression. Two neoclassical growth models highlight the importance of efficient bank intermediation and predict that levels of and changes in reserve requirements have significant impacts on the time paths of inflation, consumption, real money balances, capital and growth. Key results indicate that raising reserve requirements leads to adverse supply- and demand-side effects that raise inflation, lower growth (both considered "reserve effects") and reduce the monetary base, the base for the inflation tax. Hence, financially repressive policies are short-sighted and self-defeating. Moreover, raising reserve requirements raises real lending rates, lowering the demand for capital goods and depressing aggregate demand. In effect, the inflation tax and the reserve requirement tax conspire to form a system of double taxation. Empirical tests reveal that reserve effects tend to be generated in nations where banks and other financial institutions intermediate a large portion of GDP and/or reserve requirements are very high. For the most part, these reserve effects are generated in the long-run.
机译:第三世界金融部门的一个共同特征是存在金融压制:限制金融中介机构发挥其全部潜力的各种政策,法规和限制。有人认为,受到金融抑制的经济体的一个共同特征是实际利率非常低。但是,许多金融部门的研究尚未得出确凿的证据表明实际利率水平已系统地影响了增长率和储蓄率。本文研究了准备金要求,以代替实际利率,作为表明金融抑制的政策变量。两种新古典增长模型强调了有效的银行干预的重要性,并预测存款准备金水平和变动对通货膨胀,消费,实际货币余额,资本和增长的时间路径具有重大影响。主要结果表明,提高准备金要求会导致供需方面的不利影响,从而加剧通货膨胀,降低增长(均被视为“储备效应”)并降低货币基础(通货膨胀税的基础)。因此,财务上的压制政策是短视的,是自欺欺人的。此外,提高准备金要求提高了实际贷款利率,降低了对资本货物的需求并压低了总需求。实际上,通货膨胀税和准备金要求共同构成了双重征税体系。实证检验表明,在银行和其他金融机构占GDP很大一部分和/或准备金要求非常高的国家,往往会产生准备金效应。在大多数情况下,这些储备效应是长期产生的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Reside, Renato Elido, Jr.;

  • 作者单位

    Fordham University.;

  • 授予单位 Fordham University.;
  • 学科 Banking.;Finance.;Commerce-Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 153 p.
  • 总页数 153
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号