首页> 外文学位 >'The limits of individualism': Family and community in the fiction of William Godwin, Mary Wollstonecraft and George Eliot.
【24h】

'The limits of individualism': Family and community in the fiction of William Godwin, Mary Wollstonecraft and George Eliot.

机译:“个人主义的局限性”:威廉·戈德温,玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特克和乔治·艾略特小说中的家庭和社区。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines William Godwin's Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and Things As They Are, or The Adventures of Caleb Williams; Mary Wollstonecraft's Mary, A Fiction; and George Eliot's The Mill on the Floss and Middlemarch. Godwin, Wollstonecraft, and Eliot participated in a progressive discursive tradition that began in seventeenth-century debates over political economy, and continues today in debates over modern liberal democracy. While liberal individualism, arising from Hobbes and Locke, has been well explored, another tradition, represented by Shaftesbury and Hutcheson, is often ignored in describing contributions to the progressive tradition. These moral philosophers attack the atomistic, egoistic individual of early liberal theory, opposing an intersubjective psychology and benevolent forms of justice to selfish forms of autonomy and rights-based justice, thus providing communitarian accounts of social relations that underwrote both progressive and conservative ideologies. Godwin, Wollstonecraft, and Eliot borrow from both individualist and communitarian accounts of selfhood and sociality, constructing non-selfish versions of autonomy and benevolent forms of justice in order to counter the selfish individualism of contract and market-relations accounts of sociality. Twentieth-century communitarian, liberal, and feminist debates elucidate their concerns with negating the erosive effects of market relations on community solidarity, while also promoting liberal reform. Godwin, Wollstonecraft, and Eliot critique progressive narratives, which typically feature the reward of merit in the form of social and economic advancement, by creating, then frustrating conventional progressive narratives. While Caleb Williams, Mary, A Fiction, and The Mill on the Floss fail to provide alternate progressive narratives, each work gestures towards forms of sociality and justice that serve as models of community based on idealized family relations. Middlemarch constructs a female progressive narrative that rewards moral duty through Dorothea Brooke's happy marriage to a man of no family or fortune. Eliot thus redescribes progress in terms of moral progress, and provides a model for community in an egalitarian marriage characterized by equity, reciprocity, mutual regard, and the recognition of difference as requirements for humane relations.
机译:这项研究考察了威廉·戈德温(William Godwin)关于政治正义和现状的询问,或者《卡莱布·威廉姆斯历险记》。玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特的玛丽,小说;和乔治·埃利奥特(George Eliot)的《牙线与中间人的磨坊》戈德温,沃尔斯通克拉夫特和艾略特参加了一种渐进式的话语传统,该传统始于17世纪有关政治经济的辩论,如今一直持续到有关现代自由民主的辩论。尽管霍布斯和洛克提出的自由主义个人主义已得到很好的探索,但在描述对进步传统的贡献时,却常常忽略了以沙夫茨伯里和哈钦森为代表的另一种传统。这些道德哲学家攻击早期自由主义理论的原子主义,利己主义个体,反对主体间的心理学和仁慈的正义形式,反对自私的自治和基于权利的正义形式,从而提供了对社会关系的共产主义论述,这种社会关系既破坏了进步意识形态,也出现了保守主义意识形态。戈德温,沃尔斯通克拉夫特和艾略特从个人主义和共产主义对自我和社会性的论述中汲取了教训,构建了非自私的自治形式和仁慈的正义形式,以应对契约主义和社会关系的市场关系的自私主义个人主义。二十世纪的共产主义者,自由主义者和女权主义者的辩论通过消除市场关系对社区团结的侵蚀作用阐明了他们的担忧,同时也促进了自由主义改革。戈德温(Godwin),沃斯通克拉夫特(Wollstonecraft)和艾略特(Eliot)批评进步叙事,通常通过创造,挫败传统的进步叙事,以社会和经济进步的形式奖励功绩。尽管Caleb Williams,Mary,A Fiction和The Mill on the Floss无法提供替代的渐进式叙事,但每种工作都朝着社会化和正义形式做出姿态,这些形式可作为理想家庭关系基础上的社区典范。米德尔玛奇(Middlemarch)构建了一种女性进步的叙事,通过多萝西娅·布鲁克(Dorothea Brooke)与无家可归的男人的幸福婚姻来奖励道德义务。因此,艾略特从道德进步的角度重新描述了进步,并为以平等,互惠,相互尊重和承认差异为人道关系要求为特征的平等婚姻提供了社区模式。

著录项

  • 作者

    King, Rebecca Bruch.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Tennessee.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Tennessee.;
  • 学科 Womens Studies.;Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 241 p.
  • 总页数 241
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号