首页> 外文学位 >AN ANALYSIS OF THE ALLOCATION OF THE LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT (HOUSING SUBSIDIES).
【24h】

AN ANALYSIS OF THE ALLOCATION OF THE LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT (HOUSING SUBSIDIES).

机译:低收入住房税收抵免(住房补贴)的分配分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 eliminated the prior tax incentives for low-income housing development and replaced them with the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC). During the first nine years of its existence the LIHTC subsidized the development or rehabilitation of over 824,000 low-income units with a total cost to taxpayers of {dollar}28.7 billion in reduced federal tax revenues. When the LIHTC was first enacted in 1986 researchers warned that the tax credit as initially structured might not provide enough subsidy to encourage low-income housing development in all areas of the country. They further contended that subsidized housing development might be concentrated in those areas providing the highest returns to developers and that affordable housing development might not be located where it is most needed. Through subsequent legislation Congress took action to correct for these potential problems.; This study is the first examination of the issues regarding the allocation of the LIHTC since Congress made these amendments to the LIHTC. The data used in the study includes the LIHTC allocations to newly constructed low-income rental projects by ten states incorporating 752 MSAs and nonmetro counties for the period from 1990 through 1994. The database includes 622 newly constructed low-income rental projects with 46,373 units that were subsidized solely by the LIHTC.; The analysis of the allocation of the LIHTC to these properties resulted in the following conclusions: (1) The LIHTC does not provide enough subsidy by itself to encourage low-income rental housing development in all areas of the country even after the amendments made by subsequent legislation. (2) Newly constructed low-income housing units subsidized solely by the LIHTC are concentrated in those areas that provide the highest potential returns to developers. But this is not necessarily indicative of a poorly functioning program. And (3) the determination of whether the LIHTC is providing additional affordable rental units to those areas with the greatest need is dependent upon the variable selected to measure housing need.
机译:1986年的《税收改革法案》取消了先前针对低收入住房开发的税收优惠政策,并用低收入住房税收抵免(LIHTC)代替了这些奖励措施。在其成立的前九年中,LIHTC补贴了824,000多套低收入单位的开发或修复,使纳税人减少了总额为287亿美元的联邦税收。当LIHTC于1986年首次制定时,研究人员警告说,最初制定的税收抵免可能无法提供足够的补贴来鼓励该国所有地区的低收入住房发展。他们进一步争辩说,有补贴的住房开发可能集中在为开发商提供最高回报的地区,而负担得起的住房开发可能不在最需要的地方。国会通过随后的立法采取了行动来纠正这些潜在的问题。这项研究是自国会对LIHTC进行这些修订以来对LIHTC分配问题的首次审查。该研究中使用的数据包括1990年至1994年期间,十个州的LIHTC对新建的低收入租赁项目的分配,其中包括752个MSA和非都市县。数据库包括622个新建成的低收入租赁项目,其中46,373个单位仅由LIHTC补贴。对LIHTC分配给这些物业的分析得出以下结论:(1)LIHTC本身并没有提供足够的补贴来鼓励该国所有地区的低收入租赁住房开发,立法。 (2)仅由LIHTC补贴的新建低收入住房单元集中在为开发商提供最高潜在收益的区域。但这不一定表示程序运行不佳。 (3)是否确定LIHTC是否向需求最大的地区提供额外的负担得起的租金,取决于选择用来衡量住房需求的变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号