首页> 外文学位 >Walling in and walling out: The politics and propaganda of the Second Berlin Crisis, 1958-1962.
【24h】

Walling in and walling out: The politics and propaganda of the Second Berlin Crisis, 1958-1962.

机译:围墙进出:1958-1962年第二次柏林危机的政治和宣传。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Second Berlin Crisis (1958-1962), which left the infamous legacy of the Berlin Wall, provides an excellent window into the attitudes of the western leadership with regard to the Cold War. Because it spanned several elections and administrative changes and involved leaders of different political affiliations and generations, a careful examination of Crisis policies and goals yields insight into the common beliefs of the era. The Crisis began with Soviet chairman Nikita Khrushchev's declaration that a quadripartite peace treaty must be signed with the two German states or else the Soviet occupation forces would unilaterally withdraw from Berlin, thereby abandoning agreements concluded with the US, France and Great Britain. Coming at the end of a conflict-ridden and tumultuous decade, western governmental analysts perceived this as a direct challenge to the West's position in Germany and as an attempt to undermine the strength of the US-led alliance. The Allies responded with a bifurcated approach the pursuit of East-West negotiations about the future of Germany and Berlin, and the initiation of a propaganda campaign intended to rally inter- and extra-Alliance popular support for the defense of West Berlin, the future of which was directly threatened by the Crisis. This study reveals that, despite recurrent factiousness, real Soviet military capabilities were less worrisome than the danger posed by Moscow's political appeal and the appearance of superiority. Because of the Intellectual and ideological nature of the threat, the defense of the West rested not so much on the quantifiable strength of its arsenal as on the non-Communist community's faith in its own ability to resist and ultimately defeat the Soviet bloc.
机译:第二次柏林危机(1958年至1962年)留下了臭名昭著的柏林围墙遗产,这为了解西方领导人对冷战的态度提供了绝佳的窗口。由于它跨越了几次选举和行政变更,并且涉及不同政治派别和几代人的领导人,因此仔细研究危机政策和目标可以洞悉该时代的共同信念。危机始于苏联主席尼基塔·赫鲁晓夫宣布必须与两个德国签署四方和平条约,否则苏联占领军将单方面撤离柏林,从而放弃与美国,法国和英国达成的协议。在充满冲突和动荡的十年结束之际,西方政府分析家认为这是对西方在德国地位的直接挑战,也是削弱美国领导的联盟实力的一种尝试。盟国以分歧的方式回应,寻求关于德国和柏林的未来的东西方谈判,并发起了一场宣传运动,以凝聚盟内和盟外民众对捍卫西柏林,柏林的未来的支持。受到危机的直接威胁。这项研究表明,尽管人为地反复作风,但真正的苏联军事能力却不如莫斯科的政治吸引力和优越感所构成的危险令人担忧。由于威胁的思想和意识形态性质,西方的防御不仅仅取决于其武库的可量化实力,还在于非共产主义社区对自己抵抗并最终击败苏联集团的能力的信念。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fulcher, Kara Stibora.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 History European.; History United States.; History Modern.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 255 p.
  • 总页数 255
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 欧洲史;美洲史;现代史(1917年~);国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号