首页> 外文学位 >Church and magistrate in early modern France: Politics, ideology and the Gallican liberties, 1550-1615.
【24h】

Church and magistrate in early modern France: Politics, ideology and the Gallican liberties, 1550-1615.

机译:近代法国的教会和地方行政官:政治,意识形态和加利西亚自由,1550-1615年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The nature and extent of the so-called "liberties of the Gallican Church" were vital issues in early modern France. From the late sixteenth century well into the eighteenth, they formed the subject of an extended legal, scholarly and political dispute between a group of legal professionals centered around the sovereign courts and a group of religious personalities who had the support of most of the higher clergy. The problem had its roots in medieval conflicts between popes and secular rulers, and between the jurisdictions of royal and ecclesiastical courts within France. These phenomena lost political prominence after the Concordat of Bologna (1516), but resurfaced after 1550 when jurists took advantage of intermittent disputes between kings and the papacy to advance a new and systematic view of the Gallican liberties.;This erudite Gallican ideology combined elements of a skeptical rejection of dogmatic claims to expertise in human affairs, a reverence for the power of custom and of the ability of legal and philological history to reveal custom, and assurances that the magistrates were in a unique position to provide disinterested counsel to the monarchy--all concepts drawn from contemporary humanist culture--with a commitment to collect, disseminate and apply to political ends documentary evidence which would underwrite the Gallican position. The Gallican jurists soon clashed with the French higher clergy, bent on guarding its own prerogatives and on introducing the universalizing and very public Tridentine reformation. Acting together and in alliance with the Papacy, the prelates detailed a philosophy exactly counter to that of the erudite Gallicans, stressing the Church's transcendent knowledge and authority in human affairs. More in tune with the absolutizing ideals of divine-right monarchy than their opponents, the prelates achieved some political successes, particularly at the Estates General of 1614-5. Their spokesman on that occasion, Richelieu, carried some of their program into his ministry. Conflict between Gallican magistrates and a Church confident of its own authority, each supporting the monarch to further its own agenda, became a fixture of old-regime political culture, disappearing only when Enlightenment undermined that culture's foundations.
机译:所谓的“加利西亚教会的自由”的性质和范围是近代早期法国的重要问题。从16世纪后期到18世纪,他们形成了围绕主权法院的一群法律专业人士与一群受到大多数高级神职人员支持的宗教人士之间广泛的法律,学术和政治争端的主题。 。这个问题的根源是教皇与世俗统治者之间的中世纪冲突,以及法国内皇家法院与教会法院之间的管辖权之间的冲突。这些现象在博洛尼亚和约(1516年)之后失去了政治地位,但在1550年后法学家利用国王和罗马教皇之间的断断续续的争端提出新的系统的加利西亚自由观时又浮出水面;这种博学多识的意识形态结合了反对教条式要求人事专长,崇尚习俗的力量以及对法律和语言史揭示习俗的能力的怀疑,并确保地方法官处于为君主制提供无私律师的独特位置, -从当代人文主义文化中汲取的所有概念-致力于收集,传播并将其应用于政治目的,这些文献证据将支持加利西亚的立场。加利西亚的法学家很快与法国的高级神职人员发生冲突,一心一意地捍卫自己的特权,并推行普遍化的,非常公开的三位一体改革。主教们与教皇一起共同行动,详细阐述了一种与博学的加利坎人的哲学完全相反的哲学,强调了教会在人类事务中的超然知识和权威。主教们比神圣的君主专制国家更理想,而不是反对者,在政治上取得了一些成就,特别是在1614-5年的国会大厦上。当时,他们的发言人黎塞留(Richelieu)将他们的某些计划带入了他的政府部门。加利西亚地方法官和一个对自己的权威充满信心的教会之间的冲突,每个人都支持君主推进自己的议程,这成为旧制度的政治文化的固定装置,只有在启蒙运动破坏了该文化的基础时才消失。

著录项

  • 作者

    Parsons, Jotham Wood.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 European history.;Religious history.;Modern history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 445 p.
  • 总页数 445
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号