首页> 外文学位 >A multi-yield surface model in reference state soil mechanics for cohesionless soils and liquefaction problems.
【24h】

A multi-yield surface model in reference state soil mechanics for cohesionless soils and liquefaction problems.

机译:参考状态土壤力学中针对非粘性土壤和液化问题的多产率表面模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Liquefaction of cohesionless soils is a phenomenon that has caused a number of catastrophic events in the past. The term "liquefaction" has been used by different researchers to define both flow liquefaction in strain-softening soils and cyclic liquefaction caused during cyclic loading with shear reversal. During the last decades, different approaches have been proposed to analyze these catastrophic phenomena. Empirical criteria based on field observations, total stress analysis and effective stress analysis are the three main approaches in this area. It is believed that effective stress analysis, using constitutive models, is the most powerful tool to determine permanent deformations during and after liquefaction. None of the elements in the effective stress approach is as important as the constitutive model.; The state of the soil has a significant effect on its behavior. In most existing constitutive models for cohesionless soils, this important factor has been overlooked. As a result, these models can be used only for a small range of stresses and void ratios for which the model has been calibrated. In this study, after showing the limitation of models with no reference, a framework, termed "Reference State Soil Mechanics," is proposed. In this framework the multi-yield surface theory is extended to embrace "Reference State Soil Mechanics". The modified model is capable of predicting drained and undrained responses of loose and dense sands under both monotonic and cyclic loading with a unique set of parameters. At large strains, this model shows the same ultimate state condition for both loose and dense sands. The model can also represent the effects of initial cross-anisotropy and induced anisotropy. Two different hardening rules have been used and compared with each other for specimens at different states. Validation of the model has been achieved using comprehensive comparisons of the model predictions with experimental observations on different sands with various physical properties under both monotonic and cyclic loading. It is shown that this model is capable of handling both flow liquefaction and cyclic liquefaction in a unique framework.
机译:过去,无粘性土壤的液化是一种导致许多灾难性事件的现象。不同的研究人员已使用“液化”一词来定义应变软化土壤中的液化液化和在循环荷载作用下剪切逆转引起的循环液化。在过去的几十年中,已经提出了不同的方法来分析这些灾难性现象。基于现场观察,总应力分析和有效应力分析的经验标准是该领域的三种主要方法。可以相信,使用本构模型进行的有效应力分析是确定液化过程中和液化后永久变形的最有效工具。有效应力法中的任何要素都没有本构模型那么重要。土壤的状态对其行为有重要影响。在大多数现有的无粘性土本构模型中,这一重要因素被忽略了。结果,这些模型只能用于已针对模型进行校准的一小部分应力和空隙率。在这项研究中,在没有参考资料的情况下显示了模型的局限性之后,提出了一个框架,称为“参考状态土壤力学”。在这种框架下,多产地表理论被扩展为包含“参考状态土壤力学”。修改后的模型能够通过一组唯一的参数来预测单调和循环荷载下松散和稠密砂土的排水和不排水响应。在大应变下,该模型对松散和稠密的沙粒都显示出相同的极限状态条件。该模型还可以表示初始交叉各向异性和诱导各向异性的影响。已经使用了两种不同的硬化规则,并针对处于不同状态的样本进行了相互比较。通过对模型预测值与在单调和循环载荷下具有各种物理特性的不同砂子上的实验观测值进行全面比较,可以对模型进行验证。结果表明,该模型能够在一个独特的框架中处理流动液化和循环液化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号