首页> 外文学位 >Reason, art, and otherness: Heidegger in light of contemporary criticism.
【24h】

Reason, art, and otherness: Heidegger in light of contemporary criticism.

机译:理性,艺术和其他:海德格尔从当代批评的角度出发。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is a contribution to the clarification of the meaning of Heidegger's work for contemporary philosophy. First, I survey major criticisms of Heidegger's work by recent and contemporary philosophers, including Theodor Adorno, Emmanuel Levinas, Cornelius Castoriadis, Ernst Tugendhat, and Jurgen Habermas. I isolate six major criticisms of Heidegger's philosophy: (1) fundamental ontology amounts to an illegitimate philosophy of origins; (2) Heidegger's appeal to the phenomenon amounts to an illegitimate appeal to givenness; (3) Heidegger's central analysis of truth as aletheia distorts the conception of truth central to critical reasoning; (4) Heidegger's account of Western philosophy is incoherent; (5) Heidegger's metacritique of reason is self-refuting; and (6) Heidegger's appeal to thinking otherwise is unintelligible.;Guided by these criticisms, I next reconstruct Heidegger's interlocking analyses of truth, the phenomenon, and the proposal for a formally indicative method of exposition. I argue these analyses are damaged by Heidegger's impoverished conception of communication and lack of a conception of intersubjectivity.;Then I show how Heidegger's analysis of artworks helps him revise his earlier philosophy and introduce a new understanding of Western philosophy in its foundations in the work of Parmenides and Plato. Neidegger accordingly alters his earlier critique of reason through a new understanding of the preeminence of the principle of sufficient reason in modernity.;Next I explicate Adorno's alternative conception of the interrelationship of art, reason, and philosophy, and compare and criticize the two accounts. Both appeal to art to preserve a sense of finite transcendence amidst a world of social practices structured by and justified in terms of instrumental reason.;Finally, I present alternative accounts of foci of Heidegger's philosophy. First I re-analyze Parnenides' and Plato's conceptions of philosophy as reason-giving. Then I consider contemporary work in philosophy on ethical and social aspects of reason and concept-formation. Lastly I present an account of a recent artwork, John Cage's Ryoanji, as an indication of the continuing validity of Heidegger's and Adorno's analyses.
机译:本文是对阐明海德格尔著作对当代哲学意义的贡献。首先,我调查了西奥多·阿多诺,伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯,科尼利厄斯·卡斯托里亚迪斯,恩斯特·图根哈特和尤尔根·哈贝马斯等近代和当代哲学家对海德格尔著作的主要批评。我将对海德格尔哲学的六种主要批评加以隔离:(1)基本本体论等于非法的起源哲学; (2)海德格尔对这一现象的呼吁等于对定性的非法呼吁; (3)由于无神论使海德格尔对真理的中心分析扭曲了批判性推理中心的真理概念; (4)海德格尔对西方哲学的论述是不连贯的; (5)海德格尔对理性的元批评是自我反驳的; (6)海德格尔对其他思想的诉求是无法理解的。在这些批评的指导下,我接下来重新构建了海德格尔对真理,现象的相互联系的分析,并提出了一种形式上说明性的论述方法的建议。我认为这些分析受到海德格尔的沟通观念贫乏和缺乏主体间性观念的损害;然后,我展示了海德格尔对艺术品的分析如何帮助他修改了他早期的哲学,并在他的工作基础上引入了对西方哲学的新认识。巴门尼德和柏拉图。尼德格因此通过对现代性中充分理性原则的优越性的新理解,改变了他对理性的早期批判。接下来,我阐述了阿多诺关于艺术,理性和哲学的相互关系的替代概念,并比较和批评了这两种说法。两者都诉诸于艺术,以在由工具理性构造和合理化的社会实践世界中保持有限的超越感。最后,我提出了对海德格尔哲学焦点的另一种解释。首先,我重新分析帕纳尼德斯和柏拉图的哲学概念。然后,我考虑关于理性和概念形成的伦理和社会方面的当代哲学工作。最后,我介绍一下约翰·凯奇(John Cage)的Ryoanji最新作品,以表明海德格尔(Heidegger)和阿多尔诺(Adorno)的分析继续有效。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rapko, John Edward.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 202 p.
  • 总页数 202
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号