首页> 外文学位 >Between figures: Gender, sex, and the space of modernism (Mina Loy, Gertrude Stein, Anais Nin, Djuna Barnes).
【24h】

Between figures: Gender, sex, and the space of modernism (Mina Loy, Gertrude Stein, Anais Nin, Djuna Barnes).

机译:人物之间:性别,性别和现代主义空间(米娜·洛伊,格特鲁德·斯坦,阿奈斯·宁,朱纳·巴恩斯)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation combines early twentieth-century Anglo-American literary work with late twentieth-century literary theory to point out a logic of similarity that has not been adequately addressed. I suggest not only that certain modernist authors anticipate the conclusions of post-structuralism, but that these writers' attention to gender and sexuality and their role in writing structures challenges and extends post-structuralist claims about the grounds of signification. Focusing on Gertrude Stein, Mina Loy, Anais Nin, and Djuna Barnes, I argue that modernist literature offers models of linguistic materiality that will revitalize post-structuralist theory by challenging it to speak more directly of a material ground that is not hopelessly indebted to metaphysics.; I approach contemporary literary theory as a reading of modernism, and I identify the shared locus as a figure of "betweeness," by which I mean a transitional, liminal, pre-positional dynamic. The texts chosen for this project demonstrate a self-conscious acknowledgement of the "between" as an enabling figure that manifests itself both thematically and formally. Concentrating on semiotic and linguistic strategies that women writers use to represent figures of women, female sexuality, and the materiality of language, I argue that Stein, Loy, Nin, and Barnes anticipate one of the most startling conclusions of post-structuralism--that meaning is based upon the interplay of differences between things. Jacques Derrida's notion of the "entre" and Julia Kristeva's theory of abjection both present the between as the site of differentiation and therefore the condition of meaning in linguistic and psychological structures. I argue that literary theory's investigation of the means of articulation of signs and the subjects who use them requires an analysis of the material aspects of language, which we find in full flower in the work of these modernist women writers. These writers locate within this ephemeral play of difference an embodied medium that is neither a metaphysical ground nor the site of an inert and meaningless materiality: for these modernists, language's body is the erotic site of proximity and exchange between the material elements of articulation and the "real" bodies of speaking subjects.
机译:本文将二十世纪初期的英美文学作品与二十世纪后期的文学理论相结合,指出了相似性逻辑尚未得到充分解决。我不仅建议某些现代主义作家预见后结构主义的结论,而且还建议这些作家对性别和性的关注及其在写作结构中的作用挑战并扩展了后结构主义对指称理由的主张。我以格特鲁德·斯坦(Gertrude Stein),米娜·洛伊(Mina Loy),阿奈斯·宁(Anais Nin)和德朱纳·巴恩斯(Djuna Barnes)为重点,我认为现代主义文学提供了语言实质性模型,这些模型将挑战后结构主义理论,使其更直接地讲一种并非无可避免地归因于形而上学的物质基础,从而使之振兴起来。 。;我将当代文学理论视为对现代主义的解读,并且将共享的场所标识为“介于彼此之间”的数字,在此,我指的是过渡,界限,介词前的动态。为该项目选择的文本表明对“之间”的自我意识,这是使主题和形式上均能体现出来的形象。我着重于女性作家用来代表女性形象,女性性取向和语言重要性的符号学和语言学策略,我认为斯坦,罗伊,宁和巴恩斯预料到后结构主义的最惊人结论之一是:意义基于事物之间差异的相互作用。雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)的“实体”概念和朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃(Julia Kristeva)的否决理论都将两者之间的差异作为区分的场所,并因此将语言和心理结构中的意义作为条件。我认为,文学理论对符号表达方式及其使用对象的研究需要对语言的物质方面进行分析,在这些现代主义女性作家的作品中我们可以找到这些分析。这些作家在这种短暂的差异戏剧中找到了一种既不是形而上学的基础,又不是惰性和毫无意义的物质性的场所的体现媒介:对于这些现代主义者来说,语言的身体是发音的实质性场所,在关节和肢体的物质元素之间进行交换。说话主体的“真实”身体。

著录项

  • 作者

    Blakley, Johanna Kathlene.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.; Philosophy.; Womens Studies.; Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 180 p.
  • 总页数 180
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;哲学理论;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号