首页> 外文学位 >Fathers and brothers: Familial diplomacy of the Creek Indians and Anglo-Americans, 1733 to removal.
【24h】

Fathers and brothers: Familial diplomacy of the Creek Indians and Anglo-Americans, 1733 to removal.

机译:父亲和兄弟:克里克印第安人和英裔美国人的家族外交,1733年撤除。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation brings a study of Indian-white diplomacy in the American Southeast together with a cultural analysis of family systems, in an effort to understand the relationship between Creek Indians and Anglo-Americans in colonial Georgia and the early American republic. The "written talks" exchanged by Creek and Anglo-American diplomats, as well as treaty transcripts from the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, and other records reveal that when Creeks and whites came together to make alliances, negotiate land cessions, or simply complain about stolen horses, they commonly invoked kinship to assert their claims or make their requests. Why? What connections did both peoples perceive between the family and polity? In what ways did the experiences and ideals of family and kinship relations shape the political relationship between Creek Indians and whites in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries?; Both Creeks and Anglo-Americans modeled the relations of power and obligation, within the political world after the relationships within their own families, but they possessed two very different systems of kinship and politics. When struggles for land, peace, and sovereignty brought them together, Indians and whites turned to the institutions of kinship to help them describe and negotiate the political relationship between their two peoples. For example, the Creek repeatedly invited Anglo-Americans to join their confederacy as "brothers," while the British and Americans sought to incorporate the Indians into their empire and republic as subordinate "children." While the shared language of kinship offered the Creek and Anglo-Americans some common ground, the different obligations and responsibilities they attached to the figures of fathers, sons, mothers, and children also gave rise to frequent misunderstandings, both deliberate and unintended. So long as their diplomatic relationship endured, however, the politics of kinship offered both peoples a language for critiquing each other's society and government, and a vehicle for asserting their own political and cultural authority.
机译:本文将对美国东南部印第安白人的外交进行研究,并对家庭制度进行文化分析,以了解殖民地乔治亚州和美国早期共和国的克里克印第安人和英裔美国人之间的关系。克里克和英美外交官之间交换的“书面谈话”,以及18世纪和19世纪初的条约笔录,以及其他记录显示,当克里克和白人聚在一起结盟,谈判土地割让或抱怨时被盗的马匹,他们通常援引亲属关系来主张其要求或提出要求。为什么?两国人民对家庭和政体之间有什么联系?家庭和亲属关系的经验和理想以什么方式塑造了十八世纪和十九世纪初克里克印第安人与白人之间的政治关系?克里克斯和英裔美国人都以其家庭内部的关系为模型,对政治世界中的权力和义务关系进行了建模,但是他们拥有两种截然不同的亲属关系和政治体系。当为土地,和平与主权而进行的斗争使他们团结在一起时,印第安人和白人转向亲属制度,以帮助他们描述和谈判两国人民之间的政治关系。例如,克里克(Creek)反复邀请英裔美国人加入其作为“兄弟”的同盟,而英美两国则试图将印第安人作为其下属的“孩子”并入其帝国和共和国。虽然共同的亲属语言为克里克人和英裔美国人提供了一些共同点,但他们对父亲,儿子,母亲和孩子的身影所承担的不同义务和责任也引起了经常的误解,这是有意无意的。但是,只要他们的外交关系得以维持,亲属政治就为两国人民提供了一种互相批评对方的社会和政府的语言,以及维护自己的政治和文化权威的工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hough, Jill Suzanne.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Davis.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Davis.;
  • 学科 History United States.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 264 p.
  • 总页数 264
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 美洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号