首页> 外文学位 >Working together for a change: Local literacy councils build community from the community.
【24h】

Working together for a change: Local literacy councils build community from the community.

机译:共同努力,以实现变革:地方扫盲委员会从社区中建立社区。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Local and national debates are often characterized by inadequate understanding of literacy and literacy education. Ill-informed debates can lead to inadequate policy decisions on literacy, at both the local and national levels. Literacy is likewise often conceived and presented as a simple, monolithic skill, rather than as complex sets of shifting language events and social actions. Even the field of literacy education, composed of educators and administrators, occasionally falls to simplistic discussion of literacy, which leads to fragmentation and contradiction in literacy services. Moreover, everyday uses and values of multiple literacies are obscured, as are the economic, social, and moral complexities that surround, constitute, and complicate literacy.;To counter the lack of informed debate on literacy, this dissertation argues for more, and more inclusive, local literacy dialogues---conversations that include teachers and learners (early childhood to adolescent to adult), advocates for learners or literacy, and business, civic, and social service workers with ties to literacy and education. More specifically, the need for and viability of a community-wide forum, a literacy council, is investigated for one particular community: Lawrence, Kansas. Building from local research, surveys, and interviews with educators, literacy administrators, and community advocates, the dissertation concludes that the town's public library presents the most viable foundation for promoting local literacy dialogue. Informant responses concerning local literacy needs and goals, problems and possible solutions are presented as suggestions and guidelines for collaboration concerning literacy, literacy education, and problem-solving---to build community from the community.
机译:地方和国家辩论的特点通常是对扫盲和扫盲教育的理解不足。见多识广的辩论会导致地方和国家两级关于扫盲的政策决定不足。同样,扫盲通常被认为是一种简单的整体技能,而不是作为复杂的,不断变化的语言事件和社交活动而呈现的。即使是由教育者和管理人员组成的扫盲教育领域,有时也会陷入对扫盲的简单讨论,从而导致扫盲服务中的分裂和矛盾。此外,多种文化的日常使用和价值,以及围绕,构成和使文化复杂化的经济,社会和道德复杂性,都被遮盖了;为解决缺乏关于文化的知情辩论,本论文提出了越来越多的要求。包容性的地方扫盲对话-包括教师和学习者(儿童,青少年到成人,成人的倡导者)以及与扫盲和教育有联系的商业,公民和社会服务工作者的对话。更具体地说,针对一个特定社区(堪萨斯州的劳伦斯)调查了整个社区论坛(扫盲委员会)的需求和可行性。通过对当地研究,调查以及对教育者,扫盲管理人员和社区倡导者的访谈的基础上,论文得出结论,该镇的公共图书馆为促进当地扫盲对话提供了最可行的基础。提出了有关当地扫盲需求和目标,问题及可能解决方案的知情回应,作为有关扫盲,扫盲教育和解决问题的合作的建议和指南,以从社区中建立社区。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hendrix, Scott Alan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Reading instruction.;Educational administration.;Language.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 297 p.
  • 总页数 297
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号