首页> 外文学位 >Cossack modernity: Nation building in Kuban', 1917--1920.
【24h】

Cossack modernity: Nation building in Kuban', 1917--1920.

机译:哥萨克的现代性:库班的国家建筑,1917--1920年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores "Kazach'ia samostiinost'", the nation building and federalism of the Kuban' Cossacks from 1917 to 1920. It explores the growing tension between the particularism of the Cossack caste and the increasingly universalistic setting of modern Russia, a setting that reduced Russian Cossackdom to an isolated anachronism. The Cossacks' attempt to escape the outmoded soslovie identity and their search for a "modern" alternative marked the beginning of samostiinost'. When the new "soslovie-blind" civic order of the 1917 Revolution threatened the survival of the Cossack caste, the response of the Kuban' Cossacks was "universalistically particularistic": the promotion and practice of estate particularism in the name of universalism.;This oxymoronic move to universalistic particularism featured two problematic claims that set Kuban' samostiinost' on the path to separatism: the ethnocentric self-fashioning of Cossackhood and the state-bound claim of self-determination by the Kuban' province. When the Kuban' Cossacks launched the "People's Republic of Kuban'" in early 1918, their justification of Kuban' separatism was not a soslovie-bound Cossackhood, but a " soslovie-blind" representation of civic unity. This duality was furthered in 1918 and 1919, as the Cossacks combined ethnic self-fashioning with the idea of civic community, thereby wrapping the Cossack identity in a new nationalistic mantle. The result was the emergence of an allegedly universalistic nation-state practicing the particularistic exclusion of the non-Cossack population. It was a Cossack state proclaiming a non-Cossack civic statehood. It realized separatism while decrying it.;The paradox of Kuban' samostiinost' culminated in its alliance with the Russian Whites. By associating itself with the Cossack oxymoron, the White Movement itself became a paradox. As an alliance of two antitheses, the separatist Kuban' and the "One and Invisible Russia," the South Russian White movement was doomed.
机译:本论文探讨“ Kazach'ia samostiinost'”,1917年至1920年间库班哥萨克人的国家建设和联邦主义。它探讨了哥萨克种姓的特殊性与现代俄罗斯日益普遍的环境之间的紧张关系。将俄国哥萨克帝国沦为孤立的时代错误。哥萨克人试图摆脱过时的索洛夫身份,并寻求“现代”替代品,这标志着萨莫斯蒂诺斯特的开始。当1917年革命的新的“索斯洛维盲人”公民秩序威胁到哥萨克种姓的生存时,库班哥萨克人的反应是“普遍的特殊主义”:以普世主义的名义促进和实践财产特殊主义。矛盾的向普遍主义特别主义的转变具有两个有问题的主张,这些主张使库班的“ samostiinost”走上了分离主义的道路:哥萨克人种的民族主义自我塑造和国家对库班的自决的主张。当库班哥萨克人在1918年初发动“库班人民共和国”时,他们对库班分离主义的辩解不是索夫式的哥萨克式,而是公民团结的“索夫式”盲目代表。当哥萨克人将民族的自我塑造与公民社区的思想相结合时,这种双重性在1918年和1919年得到了进一步发展,从而将哥萨克的身份包裹在一个新的民族主义地幔中。结果是出现了一个据称具有普遍性的民族国家,实行非哥萨克人的特殊主义排斥。它是一个哥萨克州,宣布其为非哥萨克公民州。它在谴责的同时实现了分离主义。库班的“ samostiinost”悖论最终达到了与俄罗斯白人的联盟。通过将自己与哥萨克矛盾运动联系起来,白人运动本身就变成了一个悖论。作为两个对立的联盟,分离主义的库班和“一个与看不见的俄罗斯”的联盟,南俄白人运动注定要失败。

著录项

  • 作者

    Koo, Ja-Jeong.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 History European.;History Russian and Soviet.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 324 p.
  • 总页数 324
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号