首页> 外文学位 >Production planning and control and cost accounting systems: Effects on management decision making and firm performance.
【24h】

Production planning and control and cost accounting systems: Effects on management decision making and firm performance.

机译:生产计划和控制以及成本会计系统:对管理决策和公司绩效的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Cost accounting systems and production planning and control have evolved significantly over the past 75 years. While both direct costing and labor-based allocation of overhead costs have been used for much of the 20th century, activity-based costing and the theory of constraints, which includes elements of a cost system, have been developed only in the last 15 to 20 years. In production, reorder point systems were most common for most of this century, but development of JIT in Japan starting in the early 1950s and MRP in the U.S. starting in the late 1960s have brought significant changes. In addition, the theory of constraints also includes production management techniques. While the cost accounting and operations management literatures each include comparisons of the four systems in their respective areas, neither literature includes comprehensive comparisons of combinations of production planning and control systems and cost accounting systems. The comparisons that have been done have been limited to simple examples developed to illustrate the superiority of one or another of the systems under certain conditions, and generally compare either cost accounting systems or production planning and control systems while holding the other system fixed.; A systematic comparison of combinations of the four cost accounting systems and four production planning and control systems under a wide range of circumstances that allows identification of the conditions under which any combination of the systems might result in superior management decisions and improved firm performance was undertaken. The results suggest that the theory of constraints provides both superior decisions and superior operating performance.
机译:在过去的75年中,成本会计系统以及生产计划和控制已发生了重大变化。尽管在20世纪的大部分时间里都使用了直接成本法和间接成本法来管理间接成本,但基于活动的成本法和包括成本系统要素在内的约束理论已被广泛采用。仅在最近的15至20年中才发展起来。在生产中,再订货点系统在本世纪大部分时间最为普遍,但是从1950年代初开始的日本JIT和从1960年代后期开始的美国MRP的发展带来了重大变化。此外,约束理论还包括生产管理技术。尽管成本会计和运营管理文献均包括各自领域中四个系统的比较,但没有文献包括生产计划和控制系统与成本会计系统的<斜体>组合的全面比较。已经进行的比较仅限于为说明一个或另一个系统在某些条件下的优越性而开发的简单示例,并且通常比较成本核算系统或生产计划和控制系统,同时保持另一个系统固定。在广泛的情况下,系统地比较了四个成本会计系统和四个生产计划与控制系统的组合,从而确定了系统的任何组合可能导致更好的管理决策并改善了公司绩效的条件。结果表明约束理论提供了卓越的决策和卓越的运营绩效。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boyd, Lynn Howard.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Georgia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Georgia.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Business Administration Accounting.; Business Administration General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 221 p.
  • 总页数 221
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;财务管理、经济核算;贸易经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号