首页> 外文学位 >Wilhelmine imperialism, overseas resistance and German domestic politics: The case of the Center Party, 1897--1906.
【24h】

Wilhelmine imperialism, overseas resistance and German domestic politics: The case of the Center Party, 1897--1906.

机译:威廉·帝国主义,海外抵抗和德国国内政治:中央党的案例,1897--1906年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Noting the impact since 1945 of anti-imperialist resistance movements upon political constellations in the metropolitan powers, this study addresses the question whether before 1914 the resistance of populations subject to imperialism generated consequences of sufficient significance to influence domestic politics in Germany. More specifically, it explores the extent to which such resistance in the years from 1897 to 1906 affected the relationship between the Reich government and the Catholic Center party, the swing bloc of votes in the Reichstag during the period in question. Hans-Ulrich Wehler's model of “social imperialism” as a governmental sociopolitical diversionary strategy is accordingly tested against the colonial- and pseudocolonial-political developments of the mid-Wilhelmme period. The study concludes that from 1897 to 1906 anti-imperialist resistance movements in Africa, Asia, the South Seas and the Caribbean frequently and at times decisively influenced Wilhelmine domestic politics, but not in a uniform manner. In those pseudocolonial or foreign colonial venues where German national and Roman Catholic interests were generally closely aligned, as in China, Cuba, the Philippines and Samoa, resistance movements usually redounded to the benefit of the Reich's ruling elite by providing opportunities to gratify the Center's constituency cheaply without domestic concessions. On the other hand, resistance movements in German-occupied Africa arose in contexts where church-state interests clashed or where the Center's fiscal concerns predominated on the question of the costs of colonial uprisings. In these latter circumstances anti-imperialist resistance overseas seriously undermined and ultimately destroyed the government-Center partnership. The extensive evidence for the predominantly African roots of the Reichstag dissolution of December 1906 deals a blow to the applicability to that moment in history of the thesis of social-imperialist manipulation from above. The period from 1897 to 1901 is a more promising field of exploration for the social-imperialist rubric, but even here the Reich practiced only an impromptu form of that strategy.
机译:这项研究注意到自1945年以来的反帝反抗运动对大国政治体系的影响,因此提出了一个问题,即在1914年之前,受到帝国主义统治的人民的反抗是否产生了足以影响德国国内政治的后果。更具体地说,它探讨了从1897年到1906年的这种抵抗在多大程度上影响了帝国政府和天主教中心政党之间的关系。因此,汉斯-乌尔里希·韦勒(Hans-Ulrich Wehler)将“社会帝国主义”作为一种政府社会政治转移战略的模型,与威廉·威廉姆(Wilhelmme)中期的殖民和伪殖民政治发展进行了对比。该研究得出的结论是,从1897年到1906年,非洲,亚洲,南海和加勒比海的反帝抵抗运动经常且有时对威廉港的国内政治产生决定性影响,但并非统一。在中国,古巴,菲律宾和萨摩亚等通常与德国国家和罗马天主教利益密切相关的伪殖民地或外国殖民地,抵抗运动通常通过提供机会来满足该中心选区的需求,从而使帝国执政的精英受益。价格便宜,没有国内优惠。另一方面,在德国占领的非洲,抵抗运动发生在教会国家利益冲突或中心的财政问题在殖民起义成本问题上占主导地位的情况下。在后一种情况下,海外的反帝国主义抵抗受到严重破坏,并最终破坏了政府与中央的伙伴关系。 1906年12月德国国会解散的主要根源是非洲,这一广泛的证据打击了自上而上的社会帝国主义操纵论的历史到那时的适用性。 1897年至1901年这段时期是社会帝国主义专论的更广阔的探索领域,但即使在这里,帝国也只采用了即兴形式的这一策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lowry, John Sheppard.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 History European.; History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 371 p.
  • 总页数 371
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 欧洲史;现代史(1917年~);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号