首页> 外文学位 >The economics of cotton harvest mechanization in the United States, 1920--1970.
【24h】

The economics of cotton harvest mechanization in the United States, 1920--1970.

机译:1920--1970年美国棉花收获机械化的经济学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The hallmark of economic development is the long run transfer of labor from agriculture to the industrial and service sectors. This dissertation investigates the mechanization of the cotton harvest, one of the most dramatic episodes of technological change in United States history. Millions of workers from California to the Carolinas handpicked all American cotton in 1945 but by 1970 the crop was harvested by machine.;In order to evaluate the pattern and cause of cotton harvester diffusion I created a time series data set of the ratio of the machine-to-hand cost of harvesting a pound of cotton lint for 12 major cotton-producing states from 1949 to 1964. These data correlate well with the pattern of harvest mechanization and indicate that both failing capital costs and rising hand costs drove diffusion (not just cheaper machines as had been thought).;While sharecroppers and tenants picked southern cotton, I establish that a combination of day-haul laborers, migrants, and foreign workers did so from Texas to California (not just migrants as has been claimed). Western reliance upon spot labor markets allowed adoption of profitable labor-saving devices. Southerners were prevented from using spot labor markets by the combination of high heat and high humidity that deteriorated cotton value. To avoid such losses plantation owners employed a year-around workforce and housed them adjacent to the fields so they could be mobilized during the limited harvest hours available. Growers in the semi-arid west faced a much less complicated cotton harvest problem. This weather-based explanation also accounts for the spatial distribution of plantations within the south and especially the concentration of plantations in the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta.;Finally, I document and quantify the role of the Bracero Program that allowed Mexican laborers to work temporarily in the United States, primarily in cotton fields. During the 1950s braceros comprised 17 percent of the national cotton harvest labor force.;Currently farmers mechanically harvest only 20 percent of the world's cotton. This study of the patterns and consequences of cotton harvest mechanization provides insight for policy makers in countries where this type of future technological change will elicit enormous rural-to-urban migration and capital-for-labor substitution.
机译:经济发展的标志是劳动力从农业向工业和服务业的长期转移。本文研究了棉花收获的机械化过程,这是美国历史上技术变革最戏剧性的事件之一。 1945年,从加利福尼亚州到卡罗来纳州的数百万工人亲手采摘了所有美国棉花,但到1970年,已经通过机器收获了农作物。 1949年至1964年,在12个主要的棉花生产州收获一磅棉绒的实际成本。这些数据与收获机械化的模式密切相关,并表明资本成本的下降和人工成本的上升都推动了扩散(不仅仅是(尽管以前认为便宜的机器)。当共享农作物和租户选择南部棉花时,我发现从德克萨斯州到加利福尼亚州,全日班劳工,移民和外国工人的组合是这样做的(不仅仅是声称的移民)。西方对现货劳动力市场的依赖允许采用有利可图的节省劳动力的设备。由于高温和高湿度的结合,使南方人无法使用现货劳动力市场,从而降低了棉花的价值。为了避免这种损失,种植园主雇用了一年左右的劳动力,并将它们安置在田地附近,以便可以在有限的收获时间内动员他们。在半干旱的西部,种植者面临着一个复杂得多的棉花收获问题。这种基于天气的解释还说明了南部人工林的空间分布,尤其是Yazoo-Mississippi三角洲人工林的集中度。最后,我记录并量化了Bracero计划的作用,该计划使墨西哥劳工可以临时在墨西哥工作。美国,主要是棉花田。在1950年代,布拉索罗斯占全国棉花收获劳动力的17%。;目前,农民以机械方式仅收获世界棉花的20%。这项对棉花收获机械化模式和后果的研究为一些国家的决策者提供了见识,在这些国家中,这种类型的未来技术变革将引发大量的农村到城市的迁移和以劳动力为资本的替代。

著录项

  • 作者

    Grove, Wayne Allison.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Economics History.;Economics Agricultural.;Engineering Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 250 p.
  • 总页数 250
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号