首页> 外文学位 >Theological anthropology and narcissism: Interdisciplinary dialogue between Karl Barth's theological anthropology and Heinz Kohut's psychology of the self. Human being as Relational Self.
【24h】

Theological anthropology and narcissism: Interdisciplinary dialogue between Karl Barth's theological anthropology and Heinz Kohut's psychology of the self. Human being as Relational Self.

机译:神学人类学和自恋:卡尔·巴特的神学人类学和亨氏·科胡特的自我心理学之间的跨学科对话。作为关系自我的人。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The prevalence of narcissism in society and its devastating effects on the quality of human relationships is the motivation for undertaking the study of narcissism in this dissertation. Narcissism, in fact, threatens the very core of Christian faith and practice. Moreover, the paradoxical nature of narcissism begs for deeper reflection because the widespread response, in which people are merely told not to be self-centered but to orient themselves toward loving others, fails to address the complexity involved.;The thesis of this dissertation is: Karl Barth's understanding of relationality as human essence can be shown to be analogically related to Heinz Kohut's understanding of narcissistic phenomena and their healing. This analogical relationship is exhibited in six aspects of relationality: relational, dynamic, wholistic, unilateral, mutual, and doxological. The concept of the Relational Self, as developed in the interdisciplinary dialogue between Barth and Kohut, suggests a new way of envisioning pastoral theology and pastoral care for persons who are narcissistically wounded. The pastoral theological implications for adequately addressing the complex issues of narcissism include the following: (1) There is a shift in the definition of the unit of the subject matter of pastoral theology. (2) The subject matter of pastoral theology is the Relational Self, or being in action. (3) The aim of pastoral theology and care is the Relational Self marked by a life of doxology. (4) The use of Scripture in the Christian community can have a dual function: Not only to reveal who God is in Jesus Christ for us (theology), but also to provide the needed mirroring and idealization which enhance the psychological functionality of narcissists (psychology). (5) Just as sin needs to be understood only in the context of the grace, so the symptoms of narcissistic woundings (shame, self-loathing, grandiosity, etc.) need to be understood in the context of human affirmation. (6) There is a shift in epistemology from objective knowledge to relational knowledge. (7) Human relationships, while intrinsically mutual and reciprocal, also entail a dimension of unilateral initiative which can be seen paradigmatically in the initiative and care of a parent for his or her child.
机译:自恋在社会中的盛行及其对人际关系质量的破坏性影响,是进行自恋研究的动机。实际上,自恋威胁了基督教信仰和实践的核心。此外,自恋的悖论性要求进一步反思,因为普遍的反应-人们被告知不要以自我为中心,而是将自己定向为爱别人-未能解决所涉及的复杂性。 :卡尔·巴特(Karl Barth)对作为人类本质的关系的理解可以证明与亨氏·科胡特(Heinz Kohut)对自恋现象及其治疗的理解类似。这种类比关系体现在关系的六个方面:关系,动态,整体,单边,相互和本体论。在巴特和科特之间的跨学科对话中发展起来的“关系自我”的概念提出了一种新方法,该方法为自恋者提供了牧师神学和牧师照料。牧神学对于充分解决自恋的复杂问题的含义如下:(1)牧神学主题单元的定义发生了变化。 (2)牧养神学的主题是关系自我,或正在起作用。 (3)牧养神学和关怀的目的是以自我的一生为标志的关系自我。 (4)在基督徒社区中使用圣经可以起到双重作用:不仅为我们揭示神在耶稣基督中的身份(神学),而且还提供了必要的镜像和理想化,从而增强了自恋者的心理功能(心理学)。 (5)正如罪只需要在恩典的背景下被理解一样,自恋性创伤的症状(羞耻,自我厌恶,雄伟等)也需要在人类肯定的背景下被理解。 (6)认识论从客观知识向关系知识转变。 (7)人际关系虽然本质上是相互和对等的,但也牵涉到单方面主动性的一个方面,可以从主动性和父母对子女的照顾中范式地看出。

著录项

  • 作者

    Son, Angella Mikyong Pak.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton Theological Seminary.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton Theological Seminary.;
  • 学科 Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 303 p.
  • 总页数 303
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号