首页> 外文学位 >Covenant and international ethics: A deconstruction and reconstruction of liberal international relations theory.
【24h】

Covenant and international ethics: A deconstruction and reconstruction of liberal international relations theory.

机译:盟约与国际伦理:对自由国际关系理论的解构与重构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The relationship between ethics and foreign policy is increasingly important given the current trend toward globalization. However, both of the leading international relations theories, liberalism and realism, suffer from an inability to integrate the ethical and pragmatic dimensions of foreign policy. This is because of the break between the transcendent ethics espoused by these theories and the uncertainty of their epistemic foundations. This paper examines the implications of the covenantal paradigm for meeting the theoretical challenges within international ethics. The covenantal paradigm, as described by Daniel Elazar's work on the covenantal tradition in politics, provides a means of overcoming the problems of liberal and realist theories. Covenant's three essential principles are that power must be shared and limited, that liberty must be federal, or directed toward covenantal goals, and that policy-makers must have a sense of realism about the existence of evil and its political consequences.; Liberalism's origins in covenantal political culture and thought make its premises similar in many ways to the covenantal paradigm. But the Enlightenment separation between ethics and epistemology, as well as the ever-increasing liberal attraction to hierarchical methods of problem-solving, led to liberal imperialism and ethical confusion. As a result, liberal policy-makers often suffer from moral blindness and a tendency toward coercion in the international arena. Realists, on the other hand, often fall into a pattern of exercising an existential, private morality, indiscernible by those not directly involved in statecraft. This approach is unacceptable in an open society.; Covenantal thought integrates ethics and interests in a manner similar to that found in social capital theory. In addition, this paradigm retains all the benefits of liberal theory, such as a means of discerning progress in history, a focus on human rights, and an empirical grounding. Ultimately, the goal of a covenantal foreign policy is similar to Kant's vision of a foedus pacificum (a peaceful covenanted federation of nations). Nations will also be subject to the norms of international law, the foundational premise of which is pacta sunt servanda, nations ought to keep their covenants.
机译:鉴于当前的全球化趋势,道德与外交政策之间的关系变得越来越重要。但是,两种主要的国际关系理论,即自由主义和现实主义,都无法整合外交政策的道德和务实方面。这是由于这些理论所拥护的超越伦理与它们的认识基础的不确定性之间的断裂。本文探讨了契约范式对于应对国际伦理学中的理论挑战的意义。丹尼尔·埃拉扎尔(Daniel Elazar)关于政治上的盟约传统的著作描述的盟约范式为克服自由主义和现实主义理论的问题提供了一种手段。盟约的三项基本原则是:必须共享和限制权力,自由必须是联邦制的,或旨在实现盟约的目标,决策者必须对邪恶的存在及其政治后果具有现实感。自由主义起源于盟约政治文化和思想,使其前提在许多方面与盟约范式相似。但是,伦理学和认识论之间的启蒙运动分离,以及自由主义对分层解决问题方法的日益增长的吸引力,导致了自由主义帝国主义和伦理混乱。结果,自由主义的决策者经常遭受道德盲目和在国际舞台上趋于胁迫的倾向。另一方面,现实主义者常常陷入一种行使生存存在的私人道德的模式,这种行为被那些不直接参与治国法的人所无法理解。这种方法在开放社会中是不可接受的。盟约思想以类似于社会资本理论的方式将伦理和利益整合在一起。此外,这种范式保留了自由主义理论的所有优点,例如辨别历史进步,关注人权和经验基础的手段。最终,盟约外交政策的目标与康德关于 foedus pacificum (一个和平的盟约国家联盟)的愿景相似。各国也将受国际法规范的约束,国际法规范的基本前提是 pacta sunt servanda ,各国应遵守其盟约。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gismondi, Mark David.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Oklahoma.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Oklahoma.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 390 p.
  • 总页数 390
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号