首页> 外文学位 >Analyses of various methods used to quantify historical plant assemblages in east-central Mississippi.
【24h】

Analyses of various methods used to quantify historical plant assemblages in east-central Mississippi.

机译:分析用于量化密西西比州中东部地区历史植物组合的各种方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Five sets of data (faunal remains, charcoal, plant impressions in daub from house sites, pollen from soil samples, and General Land Office notes) from three archeological sites (Yarborough, Lyon's Bluff, and Josey's Farm) in the Black Belt region of Mississippi were used to test the adequacy of each database or their combinations to best estimate the past floral diversity.; The faunal remains indicated that the people ate a wide diversity of taxa and mostly small items gathered from all habitats. Some emphasis was indicated for forested terrestrial sites and backwater areas of aquatic sites.; Seeming differences among sites shown by the similarity indices actually resulted from differential sampling of each method. The canonical correspondence analysis resulted in an inadequate separation of floral assemblages between sites because of the large sampling variability in methodologies. The combination of GLO notes and charcoal gave the most similar floral assemblages. The only significant variable from the factorial ANOVA test was number of individuals across all sites and methods.; Within its limitations of selective sampling, daub has a potential for increasing the accuracy of historical floral reconstruction. These data from all three sites supported the hypothesis that the Black Belt physiographic region was generally an oak-hickory forest mosaic as opposed to a prairie-scrub successional forest.; Lack of complete sets of data from all sites and differential sampling, large variations, and biases of each method all contribute to the inability to present quantitative descriptions of the historical floral assemblage or distinguish between sites on a local basis.
机译:来自密西西比州黑带地区三个考古地点(雅伯勒,里昂布拉夫和乔西农场)的五组数据(动物遗骸,木炭,房屋现场涂抹的植物印记,土壤样品中的花粉和土地总署记录)用来测试每​​个数据库或其组合的充分性,以最好地估计过去的花卉多样性。动物群的遗迹表明,人们吃了各种各样的分类单元,大部分是从所有栖息地收集的小物品。有人指出森林地面站和水生场所的回水区。相似性指标显示的站点之间似乎存在差异,实际上是每种方法的差异采样导致的。规范的对应关系分析导致方法之间的花样组合差异很大,导致站点之间的花序组合分离不充分。 GLO音符和木炭的组合产生了最相似的花香组合。阶乘方差分析的唯一重要变量是所有位点和方法中的个体数。在选择性采样的限制内,涂抹有可能提高历史花卉重建的准确性。来自这三个地点的所有数据都支持这样一种假设,即黑带的地理区域通常是橡树山核桃森林的马赛克,而不是草原灌木丛的演替森林。缺少来自所有位点的完整数据集以及差异采样,每种方法的较大差异和偏差都会导致无法提供历史花卉组合的定量描述或无法在本地区分位点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Reese, Mary Celeste.;

  • 作者单位

    Mississippi State University.;

  • 授予单位 Mississippi State University.;
  • 学科 Paleoecology.; Paleobotany.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 31 p.
  • 总页数 31
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 古生物学;古植物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号