首页> 外文学位 >Moscow dispatches, 1921--1934: The writings of Walter Duranty, William Henry Chamberlain and Louis Fischer in Soviet Russia.
【24h】

Moscow dispatches, 1921--1934: The writings of Walter Duranty, William Henry Chamberlain and Louis Fischer in Soviet Russia.

机译:莫斯科派遣,1921--1934年:瓦尔特·杜兰蒂,威廉·亨利·张伯伦和路易斯·菲舍尔的著作在苏维埃俄罗斯。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This review of Moscow dispatches (1921–1934) is based on a reading of the writings of Walter Duranty of the New York Times, William Henry Chamberlin of the Christian Science Monitor, and Louis Fischer of the Nation. Duranty was an experienced correspondent who had expressed anti-Soviet views before entering Russia to report on American famine relief. Chamberlin and Fischer, with little journalistic experience, were enthusiastic in their support for Bolshevism. None of the three knew Russian, and all three were unfamiliar with the Soviet political system. Foreign press coverage of a religious trial in 1923 resulted in the expulsion or departure of all western journalists except Duranty, Chamberlin and Fischer. Their editors in America were more concerned with domestic reports than Moscow dispatches, except for the salient issue of censorship. The objective of this study is evaluate the journalists' attitudes, under censorship pressures, in a totalitarian state. A study is made of their reports of Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky; the dispatches which they wrote during a series of Soviet show trials; and their relations with the Soviet secret police. The journalists' private lives, personal interests and religious beliefs are relevant. Their attitudes toward Stalin's Five-Year Plan, toward a second famine which the Soviets concealed, and concerning the issue of United States recognition of Soviet Russia are explored. With recognition in 1933, Moscow dispatches lost their exclusivity. In 1934 Chamberlin and Duranty departed; Fischer followed later. Newly-accessible Soviet archives thus far have yielded no trace of these Moscow journalists. The challenge in this dissertation is to measure, through a reading of their Moscow dispatches, the correspondents' views of the regime.
机译:这次对莫斯科派遣(1921-1934)的评论基于对《纽约时报》的Walter Duranty,《基督教科学箴言报》的威廉·亨利·张伯林和《国家的路易斯·费舍尔》的著作的阅读。杜兰蒂是一位经验丰富的通讯员,在进入俄罗斯报道美国的饥荒报道之前曾表达过反苏的观点。几乎没有新闻经验的张伯林和费舍尔对布尔什维克主义表示了热情。这三个人都不懂俄文,而且三个人都不熟悉苏联的政治制度。 1923年,外国媒体对宗教审判的报道导致杜兰蒂,张伯林和菲舍尔以外的所有西方记者被驱逐出境。除了审查制度的突出问题外,他们在美国的编辑比莫斯科更关心国内报道。这项研究的目的是评估在极权主义国家的审查压力下记者的态度。他们对列宁,斯大林和托洛茨基的报道进行了研究。他们在一系列苏联演习中写的调度;以及他们与苏联秘密警察的关系。记者的私生活,个人利益和宗教信仰是相关的。他们对斯大林的五年计划,对苏联人隐瞒的第二场饥荒以及关于美国承认苏俄的问题的态度进行了探讨。随着1933年的认可,莫斯科派遣人员失去了排他性。 1934年,张伯伦(Chamberlin)和杜兰蒂(Duranty)离开; Fischer随后跟进。到目前为止,新近可访问的苏联档案馆没有留下这些莫斯科记者的踪迹。本文所面临的挑战是通过阅读莫斯科派遣人员来衡量通讯员对该政权的看法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Johnson, Allen McTavish.;

  • 作者单位

    Tulane University.;

  • 授予单位 Tulane University.;
  • 学科 History European.;Mass Communications.;Journalism.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 752 p.
  • 总页数 752
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号