首页> 外文学位 >Forests, peasants, and revolutionaries: Forest conservation in Soviet Russia, 1917--1925
【24h】

Forests, peasants, and revolutionaries: Forest conservation in Soviet Russia, 1917--1925

机译:森林,农民和革命者:苏维埃俄罗斯的森林保护,1917--1925年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1988, Douglas R. Weiner, America's leading historian of environmental politics in the Soviet Union, wrote that "through the early 1930s the Soviet Union was on the cutting edge of conservation theory and practice" (Models of Nature: Ecology, Conservation , and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia. [Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988, p. x]). Other western writers have echoed these sentiments. Even more glowing accounts of early Soviet conservation have been given by a generation of Soviet historians. The evidence overall, however, is fairly narrow. Western scholarship has tended to focus disproportionately on one unquestionable achievement: the creation, mostly during the early 1920s, of a unique network of Soviet nature preserves (zapovedniki); while Soviet writers have focused mostly on Lenin and the body of conservation-related decrees he signed into law beginning shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution.;This dissertation is an attempt to bring another perspective---that of forestry---to bear on questions of early Soviet nature conservation; and here there are many reasons to be less sanguine about both theory and, especially, practice. Among the main points argued here are the following: first, early Soviet forest conservation and management, though original in some ways, do not represent the watershed that has often been suggested---rather, important pre-Revolution precedents can be found, as can important post-Revolutionary deficiencies; second, Lenin's contributions to forest conservation are in fact much less impressive than has been argued; and third---and most important---despite great plans for managing Russia's forests scientifically and along nationally planned lines, the Bolsheviks were effectively stymied by the hostility and resistance of Russia's peasant masses, for whom any efforts at forest management were unwanted intrusions into village life.;Two major Bolshevik forest laws provide the chief focus of this study: "The Basic Law on Forests," decreed in 1918; and "The Forest Code," issued in 1923. Considerable attention is also given to the late Imperial period.
机译:1988年,美国领先的苏联环境政治历史学家道格拉斯·R·韦纳(Douglas R. Weiner)写道:“在1930年代初期,苏联一直处在保护理论和实践的最前沿”(《自然模型:生态学,自然保护和苏维埃俄国的文化大革命[布鲁明顿:印第安纳大学出版社,1988年,第10页]。其他西方作家也回应了这些观点。一代苏联历史学家对早期苏联的保护提出了更为光辉的描述。但是,总体而言,证据很有限。西方学者倾向于不成比例地将重点放在一项无可置疑的成就上:主要是在1920年代初期,创建了一个独特的苏联自然保护区网络(zapovedniki);尽管苏联作家主要关注列宁及其与保护有关的法令体系,但他在布尔什维克革命后不久就开始签署法律。这篇论文旨在尝试提出另一种观点-林业观点-来质疑早期的苏联自然保护;这里有很多理由对理论,尤其是实践都不太乐观。这里讨论的要点包括以下几点:首先,早期的苏联森林保护和管理虽然在某些方面具有独创性,但并不能代表经常被提出的分水岭-相反,可以找到重要的革命前先例,因为可能导致革命后的重大缺陷;第二,列宁在森林保护方面的贡献实际上远不如所主张的那么令人印象深刻。第三,也是最重要的,尽管科学规划和按照国家计划制定了管理俄罗斯森林的伟大计划,但布尔什维克却被俄罗斯农民的敌视和抵抗所束之高阁,因为他们对森林管理的任何努力都是不必要的入侵两项主要的布尔什维克森林法为这项研究提供了主要重点:1918年颁布的《森林基本法》。以及1923年发布的《森林法》。帝国后期也给予了相当大的关注。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bonhomme, Brian.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 European history.;Environmental science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 341 p.
  • 总页数 341
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号