首页> 外文学位 >Serving the national interest or the national identity? Explaining member state participation in United Nations peace operations.
【24h】

Serving the national interest or the national identity? Explaining member state participation in United Nations peace operations.

机译:符合国家利益或国家身份?解释会员国对联合国和平行动的参与。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study applies the three main paradigms of international relation theory—realism, liberal institutionalism, and constructivism—to explain the incentives for member state participation in United Nations peace operations. The theoretical analysis is oriented around a new five-part typology of peace operations (peace observation operations, preventive deployment operations, peacekeeping operations, selective enforcement operations, and full enforcement operations), a comprehensive survey of the participation history of all U.N. member states, and case studies on the participation of the United States, Canada, Argentina, Pakistan, and Ghana. The case studies focus specifically on four peace operations in which each of these states has participated: the United Nations Mission in the Western Sahara (MINURSO), the United Nations Preventive Deployment Force in Macedonia (UNPREDEP), the United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC), and the United Nations Protection Force in the former Yugoslavia (UNPROFOR). Where appropriate, the study draws on other peace operations to support the theoretical analysis.; The analysis applies the major assumptions and conceptual tools of the three major theoretical approaches to test their relative explanatory power. Hypotheses are developed for each of the theoretical approaches. The realist hypotheses center on strategic considerations, national prestige, tangible rewards and benefits, and military expenditures. The liberal institutionalist hypotheses center on the “shadow of the future”, international regimes, the planning and implementation of U.N. missions, and the collective action problem. The constructivist hypotheses center on national identities, collective identity dynamics, and historical experience. One of the main objectives of the dissertation is to examine the extent to which the assumptions and key concepts of constructivism can compete with realism and institutionalism in explaining the behavior of states in the international system. The study attempts to use constructivism empirically in a social scientific framework to account for state decision-making.; The research leads to several policy recommendations aimed at enhancing the participation of member states in United Nations peace operations. The recommendations are targeted at finding innovative means of recruiting states into U.N. missions, including Charter reform, changes to existing U.N. organs, and an expansion of responsibilities for individual member states in the maintenance of international peace and security.
机译:这项研究运用了国际关系理论的三种主要范式-现实主义,自由制度主义和建构主义-来解释会员国参与联合国和平行动的动机。理论分析的重点是和平行动的新的五部分类型(和平观察行动,预防性部署行动,维持和平行动,选择性执法行动和全面执法行动),对联合国所有会员国的参与历史进行了全面调查,以及有关美国,加拿大,阿根廷,巴基斯坦和加纳的参与的案例研究。案例研究特别关注了每个州都参与的四个和平行动:联合国西撒哈拉特派团(西撒特派团),联合国马其顿预防部署部队(联预部队),联合国柬埔寨过渡时期权力机构(联柬权力机构)和联合国前南斯拉夫保护部队(联保部队)。在适当的情况下,该研究利用其他和平行动来支持理论分析。该分析运用了三种主要理论方法的主要假设和概念工具来检验它们的相对解释力。每种理论方法都有假设。现实主义的假设集中在战略考虑,国家威望,切实的奖励和利益以及军事支出上。自由主义制度主义的假设集中在“未来的影子”,国际制度,联合国特派团的计划和执行以及集体行动问题上。建构主义的假说以国家身份,集体身份动态和历史经验为中心。论文的主要目的之一是研究建构主义的假设和关键概念在解释国际体系中国家行为时可以在何种程度上与现实主义和制度主义竞争。该研究试图在社会科学框架内以经验主义的方式运用建构主义来解释国家决策。该研究得出了几项旨在加强会员国对联合国和平行动的参与的政策建议。这些建议的目的是找到招募国家参加联合国使团的创新手段,包括宪章改革,改变联合国现有机构,扩大个别成员国在维护国际和平与安全方面的责任。

著录项

  • 作者

    Little, George Everett.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 522 p.
  • 总页数 522
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号