首页> 外文学位 >Strategic innovation: The third industrial stage.
【24h】

Strategic innovation: The third industrial stage.

机译:战略创新:第三产业阶段。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes the changed nature of competition between U.S. and Japanese companies in electronics-related industries since the 1960s for the purpose of developing an alternative to the historical model described by Piore and Sabel in The Second Industrial Divide.; Substantial changes have taken place in the competitive environment for these industries as a result of the introduction of continuous improvement and innovation by Japanese companies and the subsequent acceleration of product innovation by American companies. This raises the question whether flexible specialization is adequate to describe the emerging industrial stage since leading companies are no longer reacting to exogenous technological change but pro-actively using complex innovation systems to produce endogenous technological change.; To provide case data, this dissertation examines how innovation systems both within and among companies have been used in electronics-related industries in the United States and Japan to produce continuous product and process innovation. Some of the aspects of innovation systems touched upon include: mechanisms used by postwar Japan to encourage diffusion of Western manufacturing technology and support collaborative learning among companies; strategies used by Japanese companies to maintain continuous process improvement and product innovation; the relationship between the increased pace of innovation and the success of collaborative regional networks such as that based in the Silicon Valley; and the various mechanisms used by U.S. companies such as Intel and Hewlett-Packard to facilitate and implement product innovation.; Based on this case evidence, an alternative to Piore and Sabel's third stage is proposed, strategic innovation, which involves pro-active development of innovation systems instead of reactive flexibility, flexible integration instead of flexible specialization, and mechanisms that support collaboration. In contrast to the Piore and Sabel model which views the need for flexibility in the production process as the driving force for change and which has been used to rationalize downsizing and market relationships, this model shifts the focus to the innovation process where integration and collaboration is essential.
机译:本文分析了自1960年代以来美国和日本公司在电子相关行业中竞争的变化性质,目的是发展一种替代Piore和Sabel在《第二工业鸿沟》中描述的历史模型的目的。 ;由于日本公司不断改进和创新,以及随后美国公司加快了产品创新,这些行业的竞争环境发生了重大变化。这就提出了一个问题,即灵活的专业化是否足以描述新兴的工业阶段,因为领先的公司不再对外在的技术变化做出反应,而是主动使用复杂的创新系统来产生内在的技术变化。为了提供案例数据,本论文研究了公司内部和公司之间的创新系统如何在美国和日本的电子相关行业中用于产生连续的产品和工艺创新。创新体系涉及的一些方面包括:战后日本用来鼓励西方制造技术传播并支持公司间协作学习的机制;日本公司用于维持持续流程改进和产品创新的策略;创新步伐的加快与协作性区域网络(例如,位于硅谷的区域网络)的成功之间的关系;以及英特尔和惠普等美国公司用于促进和实施产品创新的各种机制。根据此案例证据,提出了替代Piore和Sabel第三阶段的战略创新,即战略创新,其中包括主动开发创新系统(而不是被动灵活性),灵活集成(而不是灵活专业化)以及支持协作的机制。皮埃尔(Piore)和萨贝尔(Sabel)模型将生产过程中对灵活性的需求视为变革的驱动力,并已用于合理化精简规模和市场关系,与此相反,该模型将重点转移到了创新过程中,其中集成和协作是必要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号