首页> 外文学位 >Employer-provided health insurance: Mobility, welfare, and labor market equilibrium.
【24h】

Employer-provided health insurance: Mobility, welfare, and labor market equilibrium.

机译:雇主提供的健康保险:流动性,福利和劳动力市场平衡。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the United States, a majority of the population gains access to health insurance coverage through their employers or a family member's employer. The primary focus of this dissertation is to quantify how this connection affects employment dynamics and economic efficiency. In addition, I study how health benefits affect inequality and welfare comparisons.; Recent research suggests that employer-provided health insurance reduces job mobility, yet doesn't quantify the welfare cost of this friction. In the first chapter, I examine the welfare consequences of employer-provided health insurance by estimating a structural job search model that incorporates health insurance benefits into the labor market decision-making process. Based on data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation between 1990 and 1993, I find that mobility rates for jobs that provide insurance are almost three times lower than jobs that do not. I then show that individuals would change jobs two more times over a twenty year period if we moved to universal coverage from the current employment-based system. In spite of the increased mobility, the welfare benefits are modest and depend crucially on how the program is financed.; In the second chapter, I develop and estimate an equilibrium model of wage and health insurance determination that yields implications that are empirically observed. Namely, not all jobs provide health insurance and jobs with insurance pay higher wages than those without insurance. While the mobility rate for jobs that provide health insurance is significantly lower than the rate for uninsured jobs, this difference is welfare enhancing since jobs with health insurance are more productive jobs.; Finally, the determination of whether one society is economically more equal than another typically involves the study of their respective income distributions. There are many other factors that influence economic inequality and, to this end, economists have developed a variety of methods to allow for the comparison of multivariate distributions. In this paper, I employ these methods to detail the state of inequality and welfare in the United States from 1981 to 1997. In addition to incomes, I include employer-provided health benefits in the analysis.
机译:在美国,大多数人口通过其雇主或家庭成员的雇主获得健康保险。本文的主要重点是量化这种联系如何影响就业动态和经济效率。此外,我研究了健康益处如何影响不平等和福利比较。最近的研究表明,雇主提供的健康保险会减少工作的流动性,但并未量化这种摩擦的福利成本。在第一章中,我通过评估将健康保险福利纳入劳动力市场决策过程的结构性工作搜索模型,研究了雇主提供的健康保险的福利后果。根据1990年至1993年收入与计划参与调查的数据,我发现提供保险的职位的流动率几乎比不提供保险的职位低三倍。然后,我表明,如果我们从当前的以就业为基础的体系转向全民覆盖,那么个人将在二十年内两次更换工作。尽管流动性增加了,但福利却是微不足道的,并且在很大程度上取决于方案的筹资方式。在第二章中,我开发并估计了工资和健康保险确定的均衡模型,该模型产生了经验观察到的含义。也就是说,并非所有工作都提供健康保险,有保险的工作要比没有保险的工作支付更高的工资。尽管提供健康保险的工作的流动率显着低于无保险工作的流动率,但这种差异在福利方面有所提高,因为拥有健康保险的工作是生产性更高的工作。最后,确定一个社会在经济上是否比另一个社会更平等的决定通常涉及研究其各自的收入分配。还有许多其他因素会影响经济不平等,为此,经济学家开发了多种方法来比较多元分布。在本文中,我采用这些方法详细说明了1981年至1997年美国的不平等状况和福利状况。除收入外,我还将雇主提供的健康福利纳入分析范围。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dey, Matthew Scott.;

  • 作者单位

    New York University.;

  • 授予单位 New York University.;
  • 学科 Economics Labor.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 119 p.
  • 总页数 119
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 劳动经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号