首页> 外文学位 >Bundling information goods in competitive environments.
【24h】

Bundling information goods in competitive environments.

机译:在竞争环境中捆绑信息产品。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Information goods, such as journal articles, are characterized by high fixed (first-copy) costs, but low costs for the production of additional copies. Standard linear pricing for this type of good cannot result in efficient production or distribution because pricing at (near-zero) marginal cost would not recover the initial fixed costs. Recent technological advances in computing and digital communication have reduced duplication and distribution expenses via electronic delivery, further exaggerating this cost structure. However, the flexibility of digital technology also permits a wider range of responses to the cost problem. For example, it is not economically feasible for the New York Times to sell articles individually when it is necessary to print articles separately and physically deliver then to customers through the postal system. However, the New York Times can (and actually does) place its archived articles on its Web site. Then, consumers download and pay for only those articles they desire to read.; In the dissertation, I examine the strategic effects of bundling information goods. Non-linear pricing schemes such as bundling are not a new concept in economics. However, most of the literature on bundling has focused on how a monopoly may use bundling as a price discrimination tool. I instead focus on the strategic implications of bundling in an oligopoly. I show that bundling remains an effective tool for recovering firms' original set-up costs in a competitive environment. However, it also results in rather fierce competition between electronic publishers. Lower industry profit leads to lower incentives to invest in content. Thus, a monopoly is likely to produce closer to the efficient amount of content. But, the much higher prices on existing content that a monopolist charges result in efficiency losses in distribution that tend to outweigh the efficiency gains from having more content. As a consequence, a duopoly is welfare-improving even though it is likely to result in fewer total information goods.; In addition, I explore how the degree of substitution between products affects the distribution of surplus among market participants. And, I consider the case where firms control the mix of content across a variety of possible categories.
机译:诸如期刊文章之类的信息产品的特点是固定(第一副本)成本高,但生产额外副本的成本低。这种商品的标准线性定价无法提高生产效率或分配效率,因为按(接近零)边际成本进行定价无法收回初始固定成本。计算和数字通信方面的最新技术进步已通过电子交付减少了复制和分发费用,从而进一步夸大了这种成本结构。但是,数字技术的灵活性还允许对成本问题做出更广泛的反应。例如,当需要分别打印商品然后通过邮政系统将其实际交付给客户时,《纽约时报》单独出售商品在经济上是不可行的。但是,《纽约时报》可以(实际上)将其存档的文章放在其网站上。然后,消费者仅下载并支付他们希望阅读的文章。本文研究了捆绑信息产品的战略效果。诸如捆绑之类的非线性定价方案在经济学中并不是一个新概念。但是,有关捆绑的大多数文献都集中在垄断如何使用捆绑作为价格歧视工具的问题上。相反,我将重点放在捆绑寡头的战略意义上。我表明,捆绑仍然是在竞争环境中收回公司原始设置成本的有效工具。但是,这也导致电子出版商之间的竞争非常激烈。较低的行业利润会导致对内容投资的动机降低。因此,垄断可能会产生更接近有效量的内容。但是,垄断者对现有内容收取的高得多的价格会导致分配方面的效率损失,该损失往往超过拥有更多内容所带来的效率提高。结果,尽管双头垄断有可能导致总的信息商品减少,但它却改善了福利。另外,我探索了产品之间的替代程度如何影响市场参与者之间的剩余分配。而且,我考虑的情况是,公司控制着各种可能类别的内容混合。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fay, Scott Alan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Economics Theory.; Economics General.; Business Administration Marketing.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 105 p.
  • 总页数 105
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学 ; 经济学 ; 贸易经济 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号