首页> 外文学位 >Development of wheel-tracking test method and performance criteria for asphalt pavements.
【24h】

Development of wheel-tracking test method and performance criteria for asphalt pavements.

机译:沥青路面的车轮跟踪测试方法和性能标准的发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Permanent deformation, or rutting, is a common failure mode of flexible pavements. Many methods have been developed to assess the susceptibility of a hot-mix asphalt (HMA) mixture to rutting and a related failure mode, stripping. Wheel-track testing is currently one of the most common methods.; Wheel-tracking tests subject HMA samples to a loaded wheel that tracks linearly along the sample, producing a rut. When the test is performed in the submerged condition, stripping may also be detected.; The Evaluator of Rutting and Stripping in Asphalt (ERSA) was developed at the University of Arkansas. It is a wheel-tracking device that has the capability of using various wheel types, and utilizes an advanced data acquisition system to describe a complete longitudinal profile of each sample as it ruts. ERSA is capable of detecting both rutting and stripping failures in HMA mixtures.; A total of 442 wheel-tracking tests were performed on field- and laboratory-compacted samples from five sites in order to evaluate the effects of specimen air void content, testing temperature and load, specimen shape, compaction method, and wheel type. The mixtures were ranked, then compared to field rutting measurements at each site after three years of service.; In general, air void contents less than ten percent did not significantly affect ERSA test results. Temperature and load were significant factors, the 50 C (122 F) and 591 (132 lb) load combination providing the greatest discrimination of mixes and the most accurate representation of field rutting characteristics. Field-compacted specimens showed less rutting resistance than laboratory-compacted specimens. Relative to wheel-type, the ERSA steel wheel was the only one able to consistently detect the presence of stripping. Moisture damage test results based on traditional methods were compared to stripping data obtained from the ERSA test, with no correlation evident between the methods.; A standard test method was developed for the ERSA device and rutting criteria were set. Maximum allowable rut depths of 5 mm (0.2 in) and 10 mm (0.4 in) were specified for mixes serving high and low volumes of traffic, respectively.
机译:永久变形或车辙是柔性路面的常见破坏模式。已经开发出许多方法来评估热混合沥青(HMA)混合物对车辙和相关破坏模式剥离的敏感性。轮距测试是当前最常用的方法之一。车轮跟踪测试将HMA样本置于一个已加载的轮子上,该轮子沿样本线性跟踪,从而产生车辙。在浸没条件下进行测试时,也可能会检测到剥离现象。阿肯色大学开发了沥青车辙和剥离的评估器(ERSA)。它是一种车轮跟踪设备,具有使用各种车轮类型的能力,并且利用先进的数据采集系统来描述每个车辙时的完整纵向轮廓。 ERSA能够检测HMA混合物中的车辙和剥离故障。为了评估样品气隙含量,测试温度和载荷,样品形状,压实方法和车轮类型的影响,对来自五个地点的现场和实验室压实样品总共进行了442次车轮跟踪测试。服务三年后,对混合物进行分级,然后与每个站点的现场车辙测量值进行比较。通常,少于10%的空气空隙含量不会显着影响ERSA测试结果。温度和负载是重要因素,50 C(122 F)和591(132 lb)的负载组合可最大程度地区分混合物,并能最准确地表示车辙。现场压实的标本显示出比实验室压实的标本低的抗车辙性。相对于轮式,ERSA钢轮是唯一能够一致地检测是否存在剥离的轮。将基于传统方法的水分破坏测试结果与从ERSA测试获得的剥离数据进行了比较,两种方法之间没有明显的相关性。为ERSA设备开发了一种标准测试方法,并设置了车辙标准。对于服务于高流量和低流量的混合物,规定的最大车辙深度分别为5毫米(0.2英寸)和10毫米(0.4英寸)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Williams, Stacy Goad.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Arkansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Arkansas.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 350 p.
  • 总页数 350
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号