首页> 外文学位 >When is a small park big enough? Effects of size, isolation and human disturbance on mammal species relaxation in Canadian national parks.
【24h】

When is a small park big enough? Effects of size, isolation and human disturbance on mammal species relaxation in Canadian national parks.

机译:小公园什么时候足够大?大小,隔离和人为干扰对加拿大国家公园哺乳动物物种放松的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Parks Canada's legislation calls for the maintenance of ecological integrity, which by definition includes the historic composition of species. Consistent with research that has used island biogeography theory as a framework for examining faunal relaxation in parks, I found that 23 of 24 (96%) of the national parks studied had lost disturbance-sensitive mammals. Unlike previous research, however, park area was not significantly correlated with species loss. An examination of landscape attributes using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) quantified the amount of human development and habitat within the boundaries, and in a 50 km zone around each of the parks to see whether these correlated with species loss. The areas of impact of human development were estimated using a buffering analysis on built features. Habitat analysis was based on satellite imagery. These variables, together with data on human population and visitor density were significantly correlated (p 0.05) with loss of disturbance-sensitive mammals.
机译:加拿大公园的立法要求维护生态完整性,顾名思义,其中包括物种的历史组成。与使用岛屿生物地理学理论作为检查公园动物区系放松的框架的研究一致,我发现研究的24个国家公园中有23个(96%)失去了对干扰敏感的哺乳动物。但是,与以前的研究不同,公园面积与物种流失没有显着相关。使用地理信息系统(GIS)进行的景观属性检查量化了边界内以及每个公园周围50公里区域内人类发展和栖息地的数量,以查看其是否与物种流失相关。使用对已构建要素的缓冲分析来估计人类发展的影响范围。生境分析基于卫星图像。这些变量以及有关人口和访问者密度的数据与对干扰敏感的哺乳动物的丧失有显着相关性(p <0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号