首页> 外文学位 >Purchase Obligations, Earnings Persistence and Stock Returns.
【24h】

Purchase Obligations, Earnings Persistence and Stock Returns.

机译:购买义务,收益持久性和股票收益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines whether purchase obligations data disclosed in the MD&A section of 10-K filings are useful in predicting and understanding firm performance. The SEC defines a purchase obligation as an enforceable and legally binding agreement to purchase goods and services in the future. Consequently, by entering into purchase obligations, firms procure resources that will be used as production inputs, but they also have an obligation to make payments to their suppliers. Therefore, purchase obligations have aspects of both assets and liabilities.;When the SEC first introduced a rule requiring the disclosure of purchase obligations, the SEC's main concern was the liability aspect of purchase obligations. Thus, a firm's purchase obligations were viewed by the SEC as having a potential negative impact on the firm's future liquidity. However, the level of a firm's purchase obligations depends on the firm's degree of outsourcing, and the growth in a firm's purchase obligations indicates that the firm expects to use more production resources in the future period. Therefore, an alternative view is that an increase in purchase obligations leads to better future operating performance. Given these conflicting views, this dissertation examines the implications that annual change in a firm's purchase obligations has for its future operating performance.;The first essay provides background information on purchase obligations. We begin by explaining the details of the SEC rule which requires the disclosure of purchase obligations. Then, we describe data collection and sample formation procedure, and provide examples of contractual obligations disclosure. After that, we summarize the types and amount of purchase obligations reported by our sample firms. Also, we document the strong persistence over time in the amount of purchase obligations as well as the short-term nature of purchase obligations. Finally, we discuss the differences between purchase obligations and on-balance-sheet assets, which lead to the main results of this work.;The second essay examines the implications of annual changes in purchase obligations for future operating performance and asset growth. We predict that firms enter into additional purchase obligations when they expect an increase in demand for their products. Consistent with this prediction, we find annual change in purchase obligation is positively associated with future sales and earnings. The results of DuPont analysis shows that annual change in purchase obligation is positively associated with future asset turnover, but it is insignificantly associated with future profit margin. Additionally, we find that annual change in purchase obligations is positively associated with both contemporaneous and future growth in on-balance-sheet assets, particularly fixed assets. These results suggest that the disclosure of purchase obligations provides useful information to investors in predicting future performance and identifying growth stage.;The last essay examines whether equity investors and analysts fully incorporate the information contained in the disclosure of purchase obligations. First, we find that annual change in purchase obligations is positively associated with both contemporaneous and future annual stock returns. This suggests that although investors appear to appreciate the value-relevance of the information in purchase obligations before 10-Ks are filed, they do not fully incorporate the resulting implications of the information in determining stock prices. Second, we find that analyst forecast errors are positively correlated with annual change in purchase obligations in the periods following the filing of a 10-K. This suggests that analysts fail to fully incorporate the information in purchase obligations when they forecast one-year-ahead earnings. This also suggests that the delayed stock price response to the information in purchase obligations can be at least partially explained by analysts' inability to fully incorporate the information.
机译:本文研究了10-K申请的MD&A部分中披露的购买义务数据是否对预测和理解公司绩效有用。 SEC将购买义务定义为在未来购买商品和服务的可执行且具有法律约束力的协议。因此,通过承担购买义务,企业获得了将被用作生产投入的资源,但他们也有义务向供应商付款。因此,购买义务既涉及资产又涉及负债。当SEC首次引入要求披露购买义务的规则时,SEC的主要关注点是购买义务的负债方面。因此,SEC认为公司的购买义务对公司的未来流动性具有潜在的负面影响。但是,公司的购买义务的水平取决于公司的外包程度,并且公司的购买义务的增长表明该公司期望在未来时期使用更多的生产资源。因此,另一种观点是购买义务的增加会带来更好的未来经营业绩。鉴于这些相互矛盾的观点,本文研究了企业购买义务的年度变化对其未来经营绩效的影响。第一篇文章提供了购买义务的背景信息。我们首先解释SEC规则的细节,该规则要求披露购买义务。然后,我们描述了数据收集和样本形成程序,并提供了合同义务披露的示例。之后,我们总结了样本公司报告的购买义务的类型和金额。此外,我们记录了购买义务的金额随时间推移的强烈持久性以及购买义务的短期性质。最后,我们讨论了购买义务与资产负债表上资产之间的差异,这导致了这项工作的主要结果。第二篇文章探讨了购买义务的年度变化对未来经营业绩和资产增长的影响。我们预计,当企业期望产品需求增加时,他们将承担更多的购买义务。与此预测一致,我们发现购买义务的年度变化与未来的销售和收益成正相关。杜邦分析的结果表明,购买义务的年度变化与未来资产周转率呈正相关,而与未来利润率无关紧要。此外,我们发现,购买义务的年度变化与表内资产(尤其是固定资产)的同期和未来增长都呈正相关。这些结果表明,购买义务的披露为投资者预测未来业绩和确定增长阶段提供了有用的信息。最后一篇文章探讨了股权投资者和分析师是否充分纳入了购买义务披露中的信息。首先,我们发现购买义务的年度变化与同时期和未来年度股票回报率都呈正相关。这表明,尽管投资者似乎对10-K提交之前的购买义务中的信息具有价值相关性,但他们并未在确定股票价格时充分考虑信息的结果含义。其次,我们发现分析师的预测误差与10-K提交后各期间的购买义务年度变化呈正相关。这表明分析师在预测未来一年的收入时未能将这些信息完全纳入购买义务中。这也表明,股票价格对购买义务中信息的延迟响应至少可以部分由分析师无法完全整合信息来解释。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, Kwang June.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 82 p.
  • 总页数 82
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号