首页> 外文学位 >Validity and reliability of accelerometers for examining vertical jump performance.
【24h】

Validity and reliability of accelerometers for examining vertical jump performance.

机译:用于检查垂直跳跃性能的加速度计的有效性和可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose. The objectives of this study were to determine the validity and reliability of an accelerometer as a device for estimating force-time curve characteristics and examine the effect of reducing sampling frequency.;Methods. Sixty college aged men and women (age=23.63.1 y; height=180.16.3 cm; weight=85.015.2kg; body fat=14.26.5%) performed 10 restricted (no arm swing) zero-load countermovement vertical jumps each for a total of 600 jumps. Peak force, rate of force development, peak power output, peak velocity, flight time and peak vertical displacement were assessed with the use of a tri-axial accelerometer and compared to a force platform + linear position transducer system. The data from the accelerometer were then resampled to determine the optimum sampling frequency. Reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variance (CV). Validity was evaluated by a linear regression analyses to determine a calibration equation, the standard error of the estimate (SEE) and a validity correlation coefficient.;Results. The accelerometer was found to be reliable for peak force, peak power, peak velocity and peak displacement for each sampling frequency. In regards to validity, the accelerometer significantly overestimated peak force, peak rate of force development, peak power and displacement while it underestimated peak velocity.;Conclusions. The accelerometer was found to be a reliable device at frequencies as low as 50 Hz, with the best validity at 250 Hz; therefore, 250 Hz is an acceptable sampling frequency when testing with accelerometers. The accelerometer overestimates some variables, which may be due to including bodyweight in the calculations.;Key words. Performance Testing, Athlete Monitoring, Sport Science, Power, Countermovement Jump.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是确定加速度计作为估计力-时间曲线特征的装置的有效性和可靠性,并研究降低采样频率的影响。六十名大学年龄的男女(年龄= 23.63.1 y;身高= 180.16.3 cm;体重= 85.015.2kg;体脂= 14.26.5%)进行了10次受限(无手臂摆动)零负荷反向运动垂直跳跃共跳了600次。使用三轴加速度计评估峰值力,力发展速度,峰值功率输出,峰值速度,飞行时间和峰值垂直位移,并与力平台+线性位置传感器系统进行比较。然后对来自加速度计的数据进行重新采样以确定最佳采样频率。通过组内相关性(ICC)和方差系数(CV)评估可靠性。通过线性回归分析评估有效性,以确定校正方程式,估计值的标准误差(SEE)和有效性相关系数。发现该加速度计对于每个采样频率的峰值力,峰值功率,峰值速度和峰值位移是可靠的。在有效性方面,加速度计显着高估了峰值力,峰值力发展的峰值速率,峰值功率和位移,而它却低估了峰值速度。人们发现加速度计是频率低至50 Hz时的可靠设备,在250 Hz时具有最佳的有效性。因此,在使用加速度计进行测试时,250 Hz是可接受的采样频率。加速度计高估了一些变量,这可能是由于在计算中包括了体重。关键词。表现测试,运动员监测,体育科学,力量,反向运动跳跃。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ruben, Ryan M.;

  • 作者单位

    West Virginia University.;

  • 授予单位 West Virginia University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Recreation.;Biology Physiology.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 164 p.
  • 总页数 164
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号