首页> 外文学位 >The Politics of Revenue-Raising Tax Reform in Latin America.
【24h】

The Politics of Revenue-Raising Tax Reform in Latin America.

机译:拉丁美洲的增税改革政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Increasing tax revenue is imperative for development and good governance in Latin America. Governments throughout the region experienced continued revenue needs in the aftermath of market-oriented tax reforms implemented in the 1980s and early 1990s, yet tax policy outcomes varied widely, across countries, over time and across tax policy areas.;This study explains variation in governments' tax reform agendas and the fate of reform proposals in Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia by analyzing the power of business, a key actor in tax politics in highly unequal societies. Many taxes directly or indirectly affect profits, and business associations may defend the interests of upper-income individuals as well as corporations. The classic concepts of structural power and instrumental power elaborate distinct means of business influence. Structural power arises from a perceived threat that a policy will lead to inadequate investment via market signals. Instrumental power entails deliberate political actions. Sources of instrumental power include relationships with decision-makers and resources that help business pressure policymakers more effectively. When either type of power is strong, taxing elites will be difficult, and reforms that policymakers view as desirable may even be eliminated from the agenda.;In Chile, strong instrumental power kept significant tax increases off the agenda. Weaker business power in Argentina gave governments more leeway to increase taxation at the cross-sectoral level, although some powerful sectors prevented tax increases with sector-specific impact. Bolivia is a rare case where business's substantial power was challenged by counter-mobilization on tax issues and a radical threat from popular sectors to the existing political and economic system.;The analysis is based on 82 tax proposals embedded in 48 reform packages. Cases in which policymakers decided not to propose tax reforms they viewed as important are also examined. Primary data sources include interviews with high-level government and tax agency officials, politicians, and business leaders, as well as congressional records, newspaper articles, tax agency reports, and tax return statistics.;This research provides insights on building state extractive capacity, which has received insufficient attention in political science. It also contributes to theory on business politics by specifying mechanisms through which economic elites influence policy in democratic societies, observable sources of their power, and government strategies that can attenuate their influence on taxation.
机译:增加税收对拉丁美洲的发展和善政至关重要。在1980年代和1990年代初期实施了市场导向的税收改革之后,整个地区的政府都经历了持续的税收需求,但各国,不同时期,不同税收政策领域的税收政策结果差异很大。智利,阿根廷和玻利维亚的税收改革议程和改革提案的命运,方法是分析企业的力量,企业力量是高度不平等社会中税收政治的主要角色。许多税收直接或间接影响利润,商业协会可能捍卫高收入个人以及公司的利益。结构力和工具力的经典概念阐述了不同的商业影响手段。结构性力量来自人们认为的威胁,即政策将通过市场信号导致投资不足。工具性力量需要刻意的政治行动。工具性力量的来源包括与决策者的关系和资源,这些资源可帮助业务决策者更有效地承受压力。当任何一种权力都强大时,向精英征税将是困难的,而决策者认为可取的改革甚至可能被排除在议程之外。在智利,强大的工具性力量使大幅增加税收不在议程之列。阿根廷商业实力的减弱使政府在跨部门一级增加税收的余地更大,尽管一些强大的部门阻止了因部门而异的税收增加。玻利维亚是一个罕见的案例,企业的强大实力受到税收问题的反动员以及流行部门对现有政治和经济体系的根本威胁的挑战。该分析基于48个改革方案中嵌入的82个税收建议。还研究了决策者决定不提议他们认为重要的税收改革的案例。主要数据来源包括对高级政府和税务机构官员,政客和企业领导人的采访,以及国会记录,报纸文章,税务机构报告和纳税申报表统计数据;该研究提供了有关建设国家开采能力的见解,这在政治学界没有引起足够的重视。它还通过指定经济精英通过哪些机制影响民主社会的政策,可观察到的权力来源以及可以削弱其对税收影响的政府策略,为商业政治理论做出贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fairfield, Tasha Ann.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Latin American Studies.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 337 p.
  • 总页数 337
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号