首页> 外文学位 >The politics of the growth of regional disparity in Japan.
【24h】

The politics of the growth of regional disparity in Japan.

机译:日本地区差距扩大的政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Japan maintained a high level of regional equality from the 1970s through the 1990s. The LDP's policies, especially regional industrial development policies, public works, national subsidies, and financial transfers to local governments, played important role in reducing regional disparity between urban and rural areas, resulting in strong support from the rural electorate. This made the LDP's long-term dominance possible. In the 2000s, however, regional disparities between urban and rural areas began to increase. This dissertation explores the causes of the regional disparity from a politics and policy perspective.;Starting in the 1980s, Japan faced international and domestic challenges, such as economic globalization, a decline of economic growth, budget deficits, and an aging society, which made it difficult for Japan to sustain the 1955 System. These problems necessitated a reform of the system. But attempts to reform made little change until the LDP reconsidered its rural-based electoral strategy. The increasing power of urban, non-affiliated voters during the 1990s began to shift the LDP's rural-oriented policies. After the election of Koizumi as prime minister, the government reduced public works projects in rural areas and redirected them toward urban areas. These projects focused on the renovation of urban centers and the construction of international airports and harbors. This was a response to strong demands to improve international competitiveness. Meanwhile, the government launched decentralization reform to cope with problems arising from globalization, an aging society, and rural depopulation. In particular, concern over local budget deficits under the conditions of the increase of the aged population and depopulation in rural areas facilitated fiscal decentralization from the early 2000s. This resulted in a high reliance on local revenue sources rather than financial transfers from the central government, providing benefits to local governments in urban areas while it damaged financial conditions of local governments in rural areas. This study argues that the increase in regional disparity was a result of the changes in the LDP's traditional, rural-oriented policies, aimed to improve Japan's economic performance and to secure the party's political power. In particular, a policy shift in public works and local finance (fiscal decentralization) considerably increased the regional disparity.
机译:从1970年代到1990年代,日本一直保持着高度的区域平等。自民党的政策,特别是区域工业发展政策,公共工程,国家补贴以及对地方政府的财政转移,在缩小城乡之间的地区差距方面发挥了重要作用,从而得到了农村选民的大力支持。这使自民党的长期统治成为可能。然而,在2000年代,城乡之间的地区差距开始扩大。本文从政治和政策的角度探讨了造成地区差异的原因。从1980年代开始,日本面临着国际和国内的挑战,例如经济全球化,经济增长下降,预算赤字和老龄化社会。日本很难维持1955年的体制。这些问题需要对系统进行改革。但是,自民党重新考虑其以农村为基础的选举策略之前,改革的尝试几乎没有改变。 1990年代,城市,非附属选民的权力日益增强,开始改变自民党以农村为导向的政策。小泉纯一郎当选首相后,政府减少了农村地区的公共工程项目,并将其重新定向到城市地区。这些项目的重点是城市中心的改造以及国际机场和港口的建设。这是对提高国际竞争力的强烈要求的回应。同时,政府启动了权力下放改革,以应对全球化,老龄化和农村人口减少等问题。特别是,在老年人口增加和农村地区人口减少的情况下,人们对地方预算赤字的关注促进了从2000年代初开始的财政分权。这导致高度依赖地方收入来源,而不是中央政府的财政转移支付,这给城市地区的地方政府带来了好处,同时又损害了农村地区地方政府的财政状况。这项研究认为,地区差距的扩大是自民党传统的,以农村为导向的政策变化的结果,这些政策旨在改善日本的经济表现并确保该党的政治权力。特别是,公共工程和地方财政的政策转变(财政分权)大大增加了区域差距。

著录项

  • 作者

    Han, Euisuok.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 253 p.
  • 总页数 253
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号