首页> 外文学位 >Planning for widowhood? Joint retirement and the allocation of pension income by older couples.
【24h】

Planning for widowhood? Joint retirement and the allocation of pension income by older couples.

机译:规划丧偶?共同退休,老年夫妇分配退休金收入。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite steady reductions in poverty among elderly Americans over the last several decades, elderly widows remain substantially more likely than married women of the same age to live in poverty. The magnitude and persistence of poverty among widows has puzzled researchers and policymakers alike. Since an elderly widow's economic status is largely determined by choices that were made before her husband's death, the relative poverty rate of widows raises the question of how couples decide when each spouse should retire, and how they decide to allocate their pension income after retirement.;The first part of this dissertation analyzes the retirement timing of married couples. I develop and estimate a structural model, in which I combine a standard lifecycle model with cooperative bargaining between spouses. The model illustrates two mechanisms through which the retirement decisions of spouses may be interrelated: leisure complementarity and unequal decision-making power. The empirical results suggest that couples with greater leisure complementarity tend to retire together, or within a few years of each other. This effect is enhanced when the wife has greater decision-making power. Because most wives are younger than their husbands, joint retirement means they retire at relatively younger ages. I conclude that this tendency toward younger retirement may increase women's risk of poverty in later widowhood, but that women choose to retire jointly because they want to, not because their husbands want them to.;The second part of this dissertation examines how couples allocate their pension income after retirement. I show that rational couples should choose single-life annuities when the husband's life-expectancy is above average, but joint-and-survivor annuities when it is below average. I find little evidence that life-expectancy matters when couples decide how to annuitize their pension income, but some evidence that when wives have greater decision-making power, joint-and-survivor annuities are more likely to be chosen.
机译:尽管在过去的几十年中,美国老年人的贫困率不断下降,但与同龄已婚妇女相比,老年人的寡妇生活的可能性仍然要大得多。寡妇中贫穷的严重程度和持久性一直困扰着研究人员和决策者。由于寡妇的经济状况在很大程度上取决于丈夫去世前所做的选择,因此寡妇的相对贫困率提出了一个问题,即夫妻如何决定每个配偶应何时退休,以及他们如何决定退休后分配养老金收入。本文的第一部分分析了已婚夫妇的退休时间。我开发并估算了结构模型,其中将标准生命周期模型与配偶之间的合作议价相结合。该模型说明了配偶的退休决定可能相互联系的两种机制:休闲互补性和不平等的决策权。实证结果表明,休闲互补性更高的夫妇倾向于退休,或者彼此之间在几年之内退休。当妻子有更大的决策权时,这种效果会增强。由于大多数妻子比丈夫年轻,因此共同退休意味着他们退休年龄相对较小。我的结论是,这种年轻退休的趋势可能会增加妇女在以后丧偶时的贫穷风险,但妇女选择共同退休是因为她们愿意,而不是因为丈夫希望她们退休。;本论文的第二部分探讨了夫妻如何分配自己的婚姻。退休后的养老金收入。我表明,当丈夫的预期寿命高于平均水平时,有理智的夫妻应选择单身年金,而低于平均水平时,则应选择夫妻共同年金。我发现很少有证据表明夫妻决定如何养老金收入时,寿命预期很重要,但是有证据表明,当妻子拥有更大的决策权时,更有可能选择共同和幸存者年金。

著录项

  • 作者

    Maestas, Nicole Anne.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Labor economics.;Individual family studies.;Gerontology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 116 p.
  • 总页数 116
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号