首页> 外文学位 >The implications of managed care and selective contracting for medical groups*.
【24h】

The implications of managed care and selective contracting for medical groups*.

机译:管理医疗和选择性签约对医疗团体的影响*。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Managed care organizations may exert monopsony power, reduce provider monopoly, or engage in bargaining with providers. Furthermore, managed care may be price-discriminating buyers or permit providers to be price-discriminating sellers. The relevant model is likely to depend on the market structure and state insurance regulations. The first empirical analyses in this dissertation test the idea that HMOs increase the price elasticity of demand for services provided by medical groups, but state selective contracting regulations prevent them. A new empirical industrial organization method is applied to data from the Medical Group Management Association to measure the elasticity of demand faced by individual medical groups. The results indicate that demand is almost fully elastic in markets where HMOs prevail and are permitted to selectively contract with a large number of competing medical groups, while it is relatively inelastic where none of these conditions are met. Results considering all markets in the US provide minimal evidence that this model prevails overall, where the coefficients are insignificant but directionally support the model. The weakness of these results suggests that HMOs may have other effects in the average market.;The second set of empirical work considers whether groups reorganize their practices for efficiency or bargaining motives. Additionally, a theoretical model that allows medical groups to choose size for bargaining purposes is outlined. Estimations are performed both as a cross-section at the market level and as first-difference at the group level to determine whether groups add physicians, expand output, or become more prevalent or concentrated as HMO enrollment increases, particularly in non-regulated states. The results suggest that medical groups have lagged responses to managed care, where growth is greatest in competitive markets. This supports the view that groups respond for efficiency reasons. No support was found for the bargaining motive.;The final empirical work examines medical group cost functions. The results suggest that a majority of groups practice on a downward-sloping segment of the average cost curve at outputs below the minimum efficient scale. These results collectively support the model that managed care can reduce physician market power and physicians respond for efficiency concerns.;*This project was supported by grant number R03 HS11932 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
机译:管理式护理组织可以发挥专卖权,减少提供者的垄断或与提供者进行讨价还价。此外,管理式护理可能是区分价格的购买者,或者允许提供者成为区分价格的卖方。相关模型可能取决于市场结构和国家保险法规。本文的第一项实证分析检验了以下观点:HMO增加了医疗团体提供的服务需求的价格弹性,但是国家的选择性合同法规阻止了它们。一种新的经验性行业组织方法被应用于医疗团体管理协会的数据,以衡量各个医疗团体所面临的需求弹性。结果表明,在HMO盛行并被允许与众多竞争性医疗集团有选择地签约的市场中,需求几乎完全具有弹性,而在没有满足这些条件的市场中,需求则相对缺乏弹性。考虑到美国所有市场的结果提供的证据很少,表明该模型在总体上普遍存在,该系数虽然微不足道,但有方向性地支持了该模型。这些结果的弱点表明,HMO对普通市场可能还有其他影响。第二组实证研究考虑了群体是否为了效率或讨价还价动机而重组其实践。此外,概述了一种理论模型,该模型允许医疗小组为议价目的选择大小。估计既可以在市场级别上作为横断面进行,也可以在组级别上作为一阶差异来进行确定,以确定组是否增加了医生,扩大产量,还是随着HMO入学人数的增加而变得更加普遍或集中,特别是在不受管制的州。结果表明,医疗团体对管理式医疗的反应落后,在竞争激烈的市场中,管理式医疗的增长最大。这支持团体出于效率原因做出响应的观点。讨价还价动机没有得到支持。;最后的实证研究考察了医疗集团成本函数。结果表明,大多数小组在低于最低有效规模的产出下,在平均成本曲线的向下倾斜部分上进行练习。这些结果共同支持了管理式医疗可以降低医师的市场支配力和医师对效率问题的回应的模型。*该项目得到了美国医疗保健研究与质量局的资助号R03 HS11932的支持。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ketcham, Jonathan David.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Economics General.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 111 p.
  • 总页数 111
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号