首页> 外文学位 >Using operational risk to increase systems engineering effectiveness
【24h】

Using operational risk to increase systems engineering effectiveness

机译:利用操作风险来提高系统工程效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A key activity in the systems engineering process is managing risk. Systems engineers transform end-user needs into requirements that then drive design, development, and deployment activities. Experienced systems engineers are aware of both programmatic risk and technical risk and how these risks impact program outcomes. A programmatic change to cost, schedule, process, team structure, or a wide variety of other elements may impact the engineering effort and increase the risk of failing to deliver a product or capability when needed, with all required functionality, at the promised cost.;Technical challenges may introduce risk as well. If a sub-component or element of the design is immature or doesn't perform as expected, additional effort may be required to re-design the element or may even necessitate a change in requirements or a complete system re-design.;Anticipating programmatic and technical risks and implementing plans to mitigate these risks is part of the systems engineering process. Even with a potent risk management process in place, end-users reject new capabilities when the iii delivered capabilities fail to perform to their expectations or fail to address the end-user's operational need.;The time between the identification of an operational need and the delivery of the resulting capability may be months or even years. When delivered, the new capability either does not fulfil the original need or the need has evolved over time. This disconnect increases operational risk to the end-user's mission or business objectives. When systems engineers explicitly identify and mitigate operational risk, in addition to programmatic and technical risk, program outcomes are more likely to meet the end-user's real operational need.;The purpose of this research is first to define the activities that could be used by systems engineers to ensure that engineering activities are influenced by operational risk considerations. Secondly, to determine if a focus on operational risk during the systems engineering lifecycle has a positive impact on program outcomes.;A structured approach to addressing operational risk during the systems engineering process, Operational Risk-Driven Engineering Requirements/Engineering Development (ORDERED), is introduced. ORDERED includes an exhaustive operational risk taxonomy designed to assist systems engineers with incorporating the end-user's evolving operational risk considerations into systems engineering activities.;To examine the relationship between operational risk considerations during the systems engineering process and program outcomes, a survey instrument was developed and administered. In addition, a system dynamics model was developed to examine the relationship between operational risk and technical debt. Finally, case studies of successful and challenged programs were evaluated against characteristics of successfully addressing operational risk during the program lifecycle. These activities lead to the conclusion that a focus on operational risk during the systems engineering lifecycle has a positive impact on program outcomes.
机译:系统工程过程中的一项关键活动是管理风险。系统工程师将最终用户的需求转化为需求,进而推动设计,开发和部署活动。经验丰富的系统工程师了解程序风险和技术风险,以及这些风险如何影响程序结果。对成本,进度,过程,团队结构或各种各样的其他要素进行程序化更改可能会影响工程设计工作,并增加在需要时无法以承诺的成本提供具有所有必需功能的产品或功能的风险。 ;技术挑战也可能带来风险。如果设计的子组件或元素不成熟或未达到预期的性能,则可能需要付出额外的努力来重新设计元素,甚至可能需要更改需求或重新设计完整的系统。技术风险以及减轻这些风险的实施计划是系统工程过程的一部分。即使实施了有效的风险管理流程,当iii交付的功能未能达到他们的期望或无法满足最终用户的运营需求时,最终用户也会拒绝新功能。最终能力的交付可能需要几个月甚至几年。交付后,新功能要么无法满足原始需求,要么需求随着时间的推移而发展。这种脱节增加了最终用户的任务或业务目标的操作风险。当系统工程师明确识别并减轻操作风险时,除了程序和技术风险外,程序结果更有可能满足最终用户的实际操作需求。这项研究的目的是首先定义可被用户使用的活动。系统工程师,以确保工程活动受到操作风险因素的影响。其次,确定对系统工程生命周期中操作风险的关注是否对计划结果产生积极影响。;一种解决系统工程过程中操作风险的结构化方法,操作风险驱动的工程需求/工程开发(ORDERED),介绍。 ORDERED包含详尽的操作风险分类法,旨在帮助系统工程师将最终用户不断发展的操作风险考虑因素纳入系统工程活动中。为了检查系统工程过程中操作风险因素与计划结果之间的关系,开发了一种调查工具和管理。此外,开发了系统动力学模型来检查操作风险与技术债务之间的关系。最后,针对成功和面临挑战的计划的案例研究,根据计划生命周期中成功解决运营风险的特征进行了评估。这些活动得出的结论是,在系统工程生命周期中重点关注操作风险会对计划结果产生积极影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gallagher, Brian P.;

  • 作者单位

    Colorado State University.;

  • 授予单位 Colorado State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 310 p.
  • 总页数 310
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号