首页> 外文学位 >Relationships between higher education funding and state, student, and institutional demographic characteristics.
【24h】

Relationships between higher education funding and state, student, and institutional demographic characteristics.

机译:高等教育经费与州,学生和机构人口统计学特征之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to provide answers to four questions. Are higher education enrollments related to measures of higher education financial support, such as federal and state tax effort? To what extent and degree are selected state demographic characteristics related to state higher education tax effort? How do states compare on their tax effort for support of higher education? How have federal and state government appropriations for higher education in the United States changed in proportion to the increased personal income of the nation?;Higher education enrollments are significantly negatively correlated with both federal and state higher education tax effort. Several state demographic characteristics are significantly correlated with state higher education tax effort.;Comparison of states' tax effort for the support of higher education indicates southern and western states comprise the majority of the top ten states with the highest percentage of state per capita personal income for higher education tax effort. Conversely, the lowest percentage of state per capita personal income for higher education tax effort is expended by New England states.;Income elasticity of demand for higher education was elastic for the nineteen-year period 1981 to 1999 on three separate measures. However, during the period 1980 to 1999, federal and state governments significantly reduced their tax effort for support of capital investment in higher education while both public and private higher education enrollments increased.;The findings and conclusions of this research support prior research indicating that federal and state governments are shifting responsibility for funding human capital investment in higher education away from both federal and state governments to students and their families. Moreover, the prevailing implications of this research are that (a) the United States will continue to have a system of higher education that is stratified by socio-economic status and (b) the inequalities of income in the future for Americans are all but guaranteed.
机译:这项研究的目的是为四个问题提供答案。高等教育入学人数是否与高等教育财政支持措施(例如联邦和州的税收努力)有关?选定的州人口特征在多大程度上和程度与州高等教育税收努力相关?各州如何比较支持高等教育的税收努力?美国联邦和州政府对高等教育的拨款如何与该国个人收入的增加成比例地变化?;高等教育入学人数与联邦和州对高等教育的税收投入显着负相关。州的几个人口统计学特征与州高等教育税收投入显着相关。;州对高等教育支持税收投入的比较表明,南部和西部州在前十个州中占多数,州人均个人收入百分比最高进行高等教育税收工作。相反,新英格兰各州将州人均个人收入百分比用于高等教育税收工作。1981年至1999年的19年期间,通过三种单独的措施,高等教育需求的收入弹性是弹性的。然而,在1980年至1999年期间,联邦政府和州政府大幅减少了为支持高等教育资本投资而做出的税收努力,而公立和私立高等教育的入学人数均增加了;该研究的结果和结论支持先前的研究,表明联邦政府州政府正在将负责高等教育人力资本投资的责任从联邦和州政府转移到学生及其家庭。此外,这项研究的普遍含义是:(a)美国将继续拥有按社会经济地位分层的高等教育体系;(b)美国人将来的收入不平等现象几乎得到了保证。 。

著录项

  • 作者

    Davis, Jackie Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Education finance.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 130 p.
  • 总页数 130
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号