首页> 外文学位 >The Complexities of Green Economy Policy Reform: A Case Study in Aceh, Indonesia
【24h】

The Complexities of Green Economy Policy Reform: A Case Study in Aceh, Indonesia

机译:绿色经济政策改革的复杂性:以印度尼西亚亚齐为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As the world continues its search for effective approaches to sustainable development, a green economy has been touted as a 'triple-win' solution. This thesis applies a political economy framework to examine the prospects and barriers for achieving green economy policy reforms. It questions simplistic assumptions regarding the feasibility of 'triple-win solutions' in green economy literature. The thesis instead reveals the conflicts, trade-offs and power dynamics that ultimately determine whether or not a green economy can be realised in practice.;The research focuses on the Aceh Green intervention, initiated in 2007 in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Aceh Green was one of the first attempts globally to transform economic and environmental management systems in an integrated, cross-sectoral manner, as envisaged by green economy engineers. An analysis of the shortcomings of Aceh Green, which failed to survive a change of political leadership, provides new insights into the difficult realities of green economy policy reform, and highlights problems within the approach and its assumptions.;I argue that Aceh Green failed to achieve its vision of a private sector driven transition towards a new economic system due to three related reasons: 1) the risk versus reward balance was not sufficient for 'green investors'; 2) actors with vested economic and political interests resisted change; and 3) the Aceh Green intervention was unable to build coalitions for change that may have helped to overcome these obstacles.;Case study findings raise important questions regarding the viability of a green economy approach to sustainable development in Aceh, and beyond. Fundamentally, the green economy approach, with its reliance on market based solutions, is vulnerable to the local investment climate as well as the lack of mature markets for 'green commodities'. Furthermore, entrenched political and economic elites can undermine the institutional reforms on which the green economy concept is founded.;The study therefore proposes that green economy efforts must be founded upon a deeper understanding of the nuanced political economy at play in different settings. The dilemma of realising a green economy is exposed as an elemental struggle between actors over the management of and access to natural resources and the benefits derived from them. The process of navigating these complexities needs to receive greater attention. In contrast, much of the current normative work on a green economy emphasises the desired policies and outcomes without factoring in the difficulties of the reform process that must be addressed. More consideration is needed of specific and early interventions that shift beliefs and realign economic incentives amongst critical actors. Without this, attempts at green economy policy reform will fail to build the necessary coalitions for change to counter vested interests.
机译:随着世界继续寻求有效的可持续发展方法,绿色经济被吹捧为“三赢”解决方案。本文运用政治经济学框架来考察实现绿色经济政策改革的前景和障碍。它质疑关于绿色经济文献中“三重解决方案”可行性的简单假设。相反,本文揭示了冲突,权衡和动力动态,这些因素最终决定了绿色经济是否可以在实践中实现。研究重点是2007年在印度尼西亚亚齐省发起的亚齐绿色干预。正如绿色经济工程师所设想的那样,亚齐·格林(Aceh Green)是全球范围内以整合,跨部门的方式改造经济和环境管理系统的首批尝试之一。对亚齐·格林的不足进行的分析未能幸免于政治领导层的变化,它为绿色经济政策改革的困难现实提供了新的见解,并突出了该方法及其假设中的问题。由于以下三个相关原因,实现了由私营部门推动向新经济体系过渡的愿景:1)风险与回报的平衡不足以实现“绿色投资者”; 2)具有既得经济和政治利益的行为者抵制变革; 3)亚齐绿色干预无法建立可能有助于克服这些障碍的变革联盟。案例研究结果提出了有关亚齐及其以外地区采用绿色经济方法实现可持续发展的可行性的重要问题。从根本上讲,绿色经济方法依赖于基于市场的解决方案,因而容易受到当地投资环境以及缺乏“绿色商品”成熟市场的影响。此外,根深蒂固的政治和经济精英会破坏建立绿色经济概念的体制改革。因此,该研究建议,必须在对不同环境中发挥作用的细微政治经济学有更深入的了解的基础上,开展绿色经济努力。实现绿色经济的困境暴露于行为者之间在自然资源的管理和获取以及从中获得的利益之间的基本斗争。应对这些复杂性的过程需要引起更多关注。相反,当前有关绿色经济的规范性工作大部分都强调了所需的政策和成果,而没有考虑必须解决的改革过程中的困难。需要更多地考虑特定的早期干预措施,这些干预措施可以在关键参与者之间转变观念并重新调整经济激励措施。没有这一点,进行绿色经济政策改革的尝试将无法建立必要的联盟来进行变革,以对抗既得利益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Swainson, Luke John.;

  • 作者单位

    The Australian National University (Australia).;

  • 授予单位 The Australian National University (Australia).;
  • 学科 Political science.;Public policy.;Environmental management.;Economics.;South Asian studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 194 p.
  • 总页数 194
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 生理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号