首页> 外文学位 >Literature, science and the Absolute: Julia Kristeva and Gaston Bachelard.
【24h】

Literature, science and the Absolute: Julia Kristeva and Gaston Bachelard.

机译:文学,科学与绝对:朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃(Julia Kristeva)和加斯顿·巴切拉德(Gaston Bachelard)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The focus of this dissertation is to examine the status of the modern Absolute in light of two paradigms that have traditionally addressed it; science and literature, I have selected Julia Kristeva and Gaston Bachelard as harbingers of an Absolute which is neither scientific in nature nor exclusively artistic. Each recognizes the demise of the metaphysical concept of the Absolute, yet struggles with a need to replace it with a category that satisfies the perennial quest for meaning.;I begin by situating the discourse of Kristeva and Bachelard against the backdrop of contemporary findings in information theory, biology, and cosmology, in particular those of Prigogine, Stengers and Varela. I then address each of the thinkers individually, Kristeva, as a semiotician and psychoanalyst, and Bachelard, as philosopher of science and literary theorist. I maintain that, while Kristeva begins as a literary critic, she ultimately converts to the theory and practice of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis, for Kristeva, is a science of the self which enlists both reason and imagination to construct a 'story' of absolute meaning that is at once immanent and transcendent. Bachelard resists any strict alliance with the rational or the aesthetic. A scientific relativist, he proposes a radical theory of "approximate knowledge;" at the same time he endorses the super-rational state of "cogito 4" as a meta-theoretical absolute. Later Bachelard sets forth his theory of the four elements---literary archetypes of the imagination that reveal an ontology of the imagination. Toward the end of his life, he revels in the quasi-mystical reflection of a candle flame, all the while reminiscing about the intellectual rigour of science. I argue that Bachelard's lack of commitment is in effect a commitment to relinquish a monolithic Absolute.;I conclude with an analysis of cosmology's consideration of absolute knowledge. Physicists such as Steven Weinberg draw a portrait of the Absolute that is as elusive as those of Bachelard and Kristeva---one which defies categorization, yet compels scientific thought to reconsider classical notions of Truth, Beauty, and Meaning.
机译:本论文的重点是根据传统上解决它的两个范式来检验现代绝对的地位。在科学和文学方面,我选择了朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃(Julia Kristeva)和加斯顿·巴切拉德(Gaston Bachelard)作为“绝对”的预兆,“绝对”既不是自然科学的,也不是艺术性的。每个人都认识到“绝对”的形而上学概念的消亡,但仍在努力用满足常年追求意义的类别来代替它;我首先将克里斯蒂娃和巴切拉德的论述置于当代信息学背景下。理论,生物学和宇宙学,尤其是Prigogine,Stengers和Varela的理论,生物学和宇宙学。然后,我分别向每个思想家讲话,克里斯蒂瓦(Kristeva)作为符号学家和心理分析家,巴切拉德(Bachelard)作为科学哲学家和文学理论家。我坚持认为,克里斯蒂瓦(Kristeva)最初是一名文学评论家时,她最终转向了心理分析的理论和实践。对于克里斯蒂娃来说,心理分析是一门自我科学,它既吸收理性又发挥想象力,以构建一个既具有内在性又具有超越性的绝对意义的“故事”。巴切拉德拒绝与理性或美学进行任何严格的联盟。他是科学相对论者,提出了“近似知识”的激进理论。同时,他认可“ cogito 4”的超理性状态作为元理论绝对值。后来,巴切拉德提出了他的四个要素的理论-想象力的文学原型,揭示了想象力的本体。在生命的尽头,他沉迷于烛光的准神秘反射中,同时回想起科学的知识严谨性。我认为,巴切拉德缺乏承诺实际上是在放弃一个整体的绝对概念。我以对宇宙学对绝对知识的考虑的分析作为结尾。像史蒂文·温伯格(Steven Weinberg)这样的物理学家描绘了与巴切拉德(Bachelard)和克里斯蒂娃(Kristeva)一样难以捉摸的“绝对”肖像,后者无视分类,但迫使科学思想重新考虑“真理”,“美丽”和“意义”的经典概念。

著录项

  • 作者

    Crocenzi, A. Gina.;

  • 作者单位

    The Catholic University of America.;

  • 授予单位 The Catholic University of America.;
  • 学科 Language Modern.;Literature Comparative.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号