首页>
外文学位
>?Historias no narradas? Intencion y forma en la novela realista espanola (Spanish text, Juan Valera, Emilia Pardo Bazan, Carmen Laforet, Miguel Delibes).
【24h】
?Historias no narradas? Intencion y forma en la novela realista espanola (Spanish text, Juan Valera, Emilia Pardo Bazan, Carmen Laforet, Miguel Delibes).
Compared to the transparency characteristic of a non-literary work, literary texts are aesthetic craftings where meaning often gets expressed in a concealed way. In narrative, two of the most distinguished features are the linear organization of events and the telling itself of those events. When analyzed as part of a larger context, each narrative is irremediably connected to time, author, and conscious or subconsciously, to ideology itself.; This dissertation attempts to study, some of the different shapes modern “realist novels” develop through a semiotic study and reinterpretation of four intriguing texts: Juan Valera's Pepita Jiménez and Emilia Pardo Bazán's Los pazos de Ulloa in the 19th century, Nada by Carmen Laforet and Miguel Delibes' Cinco horas con Mario in the 20th. My point of departure is the examination of modern literature not as the diaphanous, impartial activity which a committed, progresist author would like to say he or she embarks in, but as terrain of potential ideological conflict that needs of careful resolution between creator, characters, reader and text.; Beyond the main story, in the four texts selected there is a latent, difficult conflict, extratextual in nature, which is not presented openly. It surfaces as a second “narrative,” told in a subtle way but revealing important information about the ideological frame from which the writing emerged. My interest lies in the analysis of the narrative strategies devised in order to present and handle a similar human struggle—the conflict between love and power—and whether or not we can consider them successful in the end. Product or reaction to the constraints intrinsic in ideology, the internal coherence of each text is more completely determined by what it excludes as much as what it includes: how and which events get narrated are ultimately, for us readers, as important as the (apparent) story itself.
展开▼
机译:与非文学作品的透明性相比,文学作品是美学手工艺品,其中的含义常常以隐蔽的方式表达。在叙述中,两个最杰出的特征是事件的线性组织和事件本身的讲述。当作为更大背景的一部分进行分析时,每个叙述都不可避免地与时间,作者以及意识形态或潜意识与意识形态本身相关。本论文试图通过符号学研究和重新诠释四种有趣的文本来研究现代“现实主义小说”的某些不同形态:胡安·瓦莱拉的 PepitaJiménez italic>和Emilia PardoBazán的 Los pazos de Ulloa italic>在19世纪,由Carmen Laforet和Miguel Delibes的 Nada italic>在20世纪 super>。我的出发点不是对现代文学的考察,而是作为一个虔诚的,有进取心的作者想参加的透明,公正的活动,而是作为潜在的意识形态冲突领域,需要在创作者,角色,阅读器和文字。除主要故事外,在所选择的四个文本中,存在潜在的,困难的冲突,本质上是文字外的,没有公开介绍。它以微妙的方式呈现为第二个“叙述”,但揭示了有关写作所依据的意识形态框架的重要信息。我的兴趣在于分析为呈现和处理类似的人类斗争而设计的叙事策略(爱与权力之间的冲突)以及我们是否最终认为它们成功。对意识形态内在约束的产物或反应,每个文本的内部连贯性完全由其所排除的内容和所包含的内容所决定:对我们的读者来说,叙述方式和事件最终最终与(表观)一样重要。 )的故事本身。
展开▼