首页> 外文学位 >Virginia Woolf and the nineteenth-century domestic aesthetic: Poetry the wrong side out (Elizabeth Gaskell, Margaret Oliphant).
【24h】

Virginia Woolf and the nineteenth-century domestic aesthetic: Poetry the wrong side out (Elizabeth Gaskell, Margaret Oliphant).

机译:弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(Virginia Woolf)和19世纪的国内美学:诗歌的反面(伊丽莎白·加斯凯(Elizabeth Gaskell),玛格丽特·奥利芬特(Margaret Oliphant)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation reassesses Virginia Woolf's use of the nineteenth-century cult of domesticity to figure a modernist aesthetic and the proper stuff of fiction, especially “women's fiction,” in the early twentieth century. It argues that the novels of Elizabeth Gaskell and Margaret Oliphant provide Woolf with rich examples of ways to negotiate the feminine in fiction and ways to valorize the unrecorded lives of women through a subversive elevation of the very domestic detail that for Woolf damages the integrity of the lesser nineteenth-century women's novels. The introduction assesses Woolf's role in the production of women's writing as a disciplinary field and identifies inconsistencies in Woolf's selective “thinking back through her mothers,” inconsistencies which underscore the tensions between the public and private spheres, represented in particular for Woolf by the house of fiction and “The Angel in the House.” Chapter One examines how Woolf's modernist projects merge with her feminist projects though her dialogic engagement with nineteenth-century “conventions” in her discursive essays on modern fiction and the woman writer's particular impediments. Chapter Two juxtaposes Woolf's critique of Gaskell's fiction—her apparent inability to create interesting characters and her excessive use of detail—with Gaskell's Wives and Daughters (1865) to argue that the details themselves develop a psychological complexity that prefigures Woolf's own ideals for women's future writing. Chapter Three examines the family and professional connections between Oliphant and Woolf that inform Woolf's anger at Oliphant's intellectual prostitution in Three Guineas. Chapter Four examines Oliphant's Miss Majoribanks (1865–6), a narrative that inverts nineteenth-century conceptions of artistry and high cultural production with conceptions of domesticity and low cultural production. Chapter Five then reads Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway (1925) and To the Lighthouse (1927) to demonstrate how Woolf's deployment of the spiritual and material dimensions of nineteenth-century descriptions of femininity contributes to her creation of modern subjectivity, of feminine retreat, and of feminine creativity. The conclusion argues that Woolf's work dialectically inscribes questions about the enduring value of domestic practices even as it reclaims feminine creative power in the domestic sphere for women's use.
机译:本论文重新评估了弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(Virginia Woolf)对19世纪的家庭崇拜的运用,以得出现代主义的审美观和适当的小说内容,尤其是20世纪初的“妇女小说”。它认为,伊丽莎白·加斯凯尔(Elizabeth Gaskell)和玛格丽特·奥利芬特(Margaret Oliphant)的小说为伍尔夫提供了丰富的例子,说明了在小说中谈判女性的方式,以及通过颠覆性地抬高了国内细节的方法来使妇女的未记录生活增值,这对伍尔夫来说是有害的。十九世纪较小的女性小说。导言评估了伍尔夫在学科写作领域中女性写作的作用,并指出了伍尔夫选择性地“通过母亲反思”中的矛盾之处,这些矛盾之处强调了公共领域和私人领域之间的紧张关系,尤其是在伍尔夫所代表的地方。小说和《屋中的天使》。第一章探讨了伍尔夫的现代主义计划如何与女性主义计划相融合,尽管她在有关现代小说和女作家的特殊论述的论述中与十九世纪的“习俗”进行对话。第二章将伍尔夫对加斯凯尔小说的批判并置-她明显无法创造有趣的角色,并且过度使用细节-加斯凯尔的《 妻子和女儿》(1865年)论证说,细节本身使人产生了心理上的复杂性,这预示着伍尔夫对于女性未来写作的理想。第三章考察了奥利潘特和伍尔夫之间的家庭关系和职业联系,这些信息表明伍尔夫对《三个几内亚》中的奥利潘特的卖淫感到愤怒。第四章考察了奥利潘特的 Majoribanks小姐(1865–6),该叙述将19世纪的艺术性和高文化生产观念与家庭性和低文化生产观念相提并论。然后,第五章阅读伍尔夫的夫人。 Dalloway (1925)和到灯塔(1927)展示了伍尔夫对19世纪女性气质描述的精神和物质维度的部署如何帮助她创造了现代的女性主观性撤退,并具有女性创造力。该结论认为,伍尔夫的作品辩解性地提出了关于家庭实践的持久价值的问题,尽管该声明在家庭领域中回收了女性使用的女性创造力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Blair, Emily.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Davis.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Davis.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.; Literature English.; Womens Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 334 p.
  • 总页数 334
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号